BMI S10 vs MSA S10

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Steve Luthye
Posts: 4
Joined: 8 Jan 2022 6:40 pm
Location: Texas, USA

BMI S10 vs MSA S10

Post by Steve Luthye »

Hello, Steeler Collective. I'm a veteran musician, but beginner steel player. I'm learning on a mid-80s BMI S10 3x4. I have the opportunity to buy a mid-70s MSA Classic S10 4x4. It looks to be in excellent condition, haven't played on it yet. The MSA comes with the original case and a pack a seat (not sure what brand or vintage; it has a sticker that says "professional performer series" on the front).

My question is this: assuming everything works as it should when I go check it out, is the MSA better quality instrument than the BMI? And what would be a fair price for the MSA package?


Thanks!
Daniel Stein
Posts: 886
Joined: 30 Jul 2017 6:50 am
Location: Glen Allen, Virginia, US

steel

Post by Daniel Stein »

stick with bmi, they are still made today and parts are available


if you can get both, keep msa package under 1500 if possible
Guitar,Bass,Drums,PSG,Lapsteel,Mandolin,Banjo
1978 sho bud pro 2 d10 8x5
1971 Emmons d10 8x4
Quilter mach 3
Sho bud single channel amp
Custom Tele with Fralins,Matney B bender and Warmoth neck
Fender telecaster bass with fralin pickup
Yamaha fretless bass
MarkBass 1x12 (Bass rig)
1973 Slingerland Drumkit with Old zildjian cymbals
Yamaha modx 6 (keyboard)
yamaha sv120 fiddle
1979 washburn Jethro burns mandolin (with LR baggs pickup)
2022 deering deluxe banjo (dotson bridge, emg acb pickup)
User avatar
Nicholas Scott
Posts: 781
Joined: 12 Apr 2016 10:15 am
Location: Norfolk, VA USA

Post by Nicholas Scott »

Stick with the BMI.
Emmons D10 PP, Peavey Nashville 112, Quilter Steelaire, Goodrich OMNI VP, And Sarno Black Box, Walker Steel Seat
Karl Kononchuk
Posts: 7
Joined: 3 Aug 2021 12:23 pm
Location: California, USA

Post by Karl Kononchuk »

MSA are still made today as well, and they are absolutely fabulous.
User avatar
Ken Pippus
Posts: 2618
Joined: 8 Feb 2007 7:55 am
Location: Langford, BC, Canada

Post by Ken Pippus »

The current MSA bears absolutely no resemblance to the old ones, and parts availability is not through the company. I would stick with the BMI.

And a lot of people thought the old ones were not fabulous, though they certainly were substantial!
User avatar
Bob Hoffnar
Posts: 9244
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Austin, Tx
Contact:

Post by Bob Hoffnar »

I like how BMI steels sound. Clear and full tone. I prefer them to MSA.
Bob
User avatar
Samuel Phillippe
Posts: 329
Joined: 10 Jan 2022 8:11 am
Location: Douglas Michigan, USA

Post by Samuel Phillippe »

My 2 cents.... stick with BMI
User avatar
memphislim
Posts: 1139
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Austin, Texas
Contact:

Post by memphislim »

BMI
Bob Carlucci
Posts: 6965
Joined: 26 Dec 2003 1:01 am
Location: Candor, New York, USA

Post by Bob Carlucci »

Depends.. If its a mica body MSA, I would stick with the BMI. Wood/lacquer body MSA?-Totally different animal.. That type of MSA Classic is a better guitar than a BMI in my opinion, although I really like BMI guitars.

You did say it was a mid 70's MSA which probably indicates a mica body, in which case I would pass..

ANY MSA Classic guitar is mechanically superior to a BMI... They play better in my opinion and are very dependable and trouble free.. However, the BMI has a better sound than an MSA Mica,,, MSA maple/lacquer body guitars have a lot better tone and sustain than MSA Mica body guitars do generally, but there are exceptions out there.. I have seen some and heard some very good sounding Mica MSA guitars, but have seen and owned some real mutts as well. They are both really good guitars, and you can't go wrong either way.. If you already have a BMI, why change?... bob
I'm over the hill and hittin'rocks on the way down!

no gear list for me.. you don't have the time......
Kevin Hatton
Posts: 8173
Joined: 3 Jan 2002 1:01 am
Location: Buffalo, N.Y.
Contact:

Post by Kevin Hatton »

Bob's analysis is spot on. Wood verses mica tone .
David Higginbotham
Posts: 3618
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 1:01 am
Location: Lake Charles, Louisiana, USA

Post by David Higginbotham »

Bob Carlucci,
The MSA is a mica rather than lacquered body. But everything you wrote is nearly word for word of what I wrote in the exchange of PM’s with Steve regarding his inquiry. That’s almost scary but shows we share the same thoughts regarding our experience with both of these steels. Great minds think alike, my friend! 😂👍🏻
Dave
User avatar
Dave Mudgett
Moderator
Posts: 9648
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 12:01 am
Location: Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee

Post by Dave Mudgett »

I agree - stick with the BMI. I see no advantage to going to a mid-70s mica-body MSA. As has already been stated, BMIs are very good playing and sounding guitars, and beyond that, they are very easy to work on and you can get parts since they're still being made.

Don't get me wrong, MSAs are good guitars too. But I would not change unless there was some big advantage. If someone said Zum, Franklin, Emmons, new model MSA (which, as stated, is a very different guitar than the old ones), or something like that, it might make sense. If you're hell bent to get something different, keep your powder dry until something dynamite shows up.
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21192
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.

Post by Donny Hinson »

That "Professional Performer Series" sticker on the MSA is bogus, somebody just stuck that on there. (It probably came from a speaker or a tennis racquet. :lol: ) The BMI is a decent steel, is still produced, and you can add pedals for $130 each, which is cheaper than any other steel. The mechs on an MSA are a little more precise, but unless you're having a problem, stick with what you have. For a beginner, going from one guitar to another is a fool's errand.

Good luck! 8)
User avatar
Dennis Detweiler
Posts: 3488
Joined: 8 Dec 1998 1:01 am
Location: Solon, Iowa, US

Post by Dennis Detweiler »

I have two MSA's. 1975 and 1976. Both are birdseye maple lacquer body and neck. Excellent tone and sustain. I think MSA transitioned from Mica to maple/lacquer in mid 1975. The wood necks are one inch thick.
1976 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics 427 pickup, 1975 Birdseye U-12 MSA with Telonics X-12 pickup, Boss 59 Fender pedal for preamp, NDR-5 Atlantic Delay & Reverb, two Quilter 201 amps, 2- 12" Eminence EPS-12C speakers, ShoBud Pedal, 1949 Epiphone D-8. Revelation preamp into a Crown XLS 1002 power amp.
User avatar
Tony Prior
Posts: 14522
Joined: 17 Oct 2001 12:01 am
Location: Charlotte NC
Contact:

Post by Tony Prior »

get the one that weighs less :D They are both going to accommodate you as a NEW player for a very long time, like years ! :D
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders
Pro Tools 8 and Pro Tools 12
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 8 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
Post Reply