sho bud Maverick
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
- chris ivey
- Posts: 12703
- Joined: 8 Nov 1998 1:01 am
- Location: california (deceased)
here's a maverick that had the wallpaper covering removed and some cool barbwire auto pinstripe tape added. this thing works well and sounds good for what it is.
Last edited by chris ivey on 10 Apr 2011 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- John Billings
- Posts: 9344
- Joined: 11 Jul 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Ohio, USA
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 12 Apr 2012 10:43 pm
- Location: Washington, USA
If you can get an edge of the vynal started, use your wife"s hair dryer to heat the underside as you pull the covering up....works on many applications herePaul Redmond wrote:Use naphtha or Zippo lighter fluid to soften and remove the glue under the contact paper/vinyl covering. It won't harm the lacquer underneath. The clear lacquer is not very heavy...just enough to seal the wood.
Back in 1978, I removed the vinyl from mine using naphtha, then wet-sanded the existing lacquer slightly with 1000-grit Wet-or-Dry sandpaper. I sprayed clear R-M automotive lacquer over the body, then hand-rubbed the finish with toothpaste and a damp rag. Toothpaste contains pumice which is also used in most fine buffing compounds used by body shops.
The results of this procedure can be seen on a Forum post called "Hot Rod Maverick" if you do a search.
PRR
5220 Gretsch
Godin A-6
Godan 5th Ave.
Fender 400 PSG 4+2
buncha amps
Godin A-6
Godan 5th Ave.
Fender 400 PSG 4+2
buncha amps
- Todd Snelgrove
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 6 Nov 2021 9:46 am
- Location: Newfoundland, Canada
- Contact:
Hilarious.
I just joined the forum and at the same time took a few pics of my Sho-Bud Maverick to post in the serial numbers thread. Then I'm scrolling through the forum and I find this old thread and I see Chris Ivey's post (above) and think, "Not only is that almost my PSG, it's almost my damn carpet!"
Hilarious.
(PS I'm kinda disappointed to discover in this thread that I have such an entry-level starter instrument but man, it's keeping me busy and I think it sounds awesome. But what do I know...I've been playing the thing for a coupla months.)
I just joined the forum and at the same time took a few pics of my Sho-Bud Maverick to post in the serial numbers thread. Then I'm scrolling through the forum and I find this old thread and I see Chris Ivey's post (above) and think, "Not only is that almost my PSG, it's almost my damn carpet!"
Hilarious.
(PS I'm kinda disappointed to discover in this thread that I have such an entry-level starter instrument but man, it's keeping me busy and I think it sounds awesome. But what do I know...I've been playing the thing for a coupla months.)
'72 Sho-Bud Maverick
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: 6 Sep 2021 10:45 pm
- Location: South Australia
- Ken Pippus
- Posts: 2618
- Joined: 8 Feb 2007 7:55 am
- Location: Langford, BC, Canada
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: 13 Nov 2002 1:01 am
- Location: Cornwall, England
Upgraded Maverick
These are the parts used .This is what I did to a Sho-Bud Maverick,the wood is beautiful Maple ,the legs are just a push in,but can still be adjusted at the back to get the steel level.The changer is a 3x3 ,it plays really great and sounds awesome.
JG.
JG.
Last edited by Jimmy Gibson on 12 Nov 2021 6:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Todd Snelgrove
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 6 Nov 2021 9:46 am
- Location: Newfoundland, Canada
- Contact:
Yes, I noticed that it wasn't exactly the same guitar (or carpet).
I'm a total newb. I have no clue.
Why is that? Is it due to the differences that John pointed out, because of the extra wood and the raised headstock...err...tuner rack? Or maybe because I spent six hours cleaning, oiling, and polishing the thing before I took the picture?Ken Pippus wrote:Just to clarify, Todd, yours is way, way cooler.
I'm a total newb. I have no clue.
'72 Sho-Bud Maverick
- Ryan Coplen
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 28 Oct 2021 7:15 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas
Hehehe, I'm sure your cleaning didn't hurt. But IMHO, your Maverick is cooler than mine and his because of the reasons you mentioned - the Gumby headstock and the raised wood neck. Mine's a 3+1 like his, with the ashtray for the tuning keys. But I don't think mine had shelf paper when it was new. It didn't when I got it.
I'm no great shakes at the pedal steel myself, but I recently bought a S12 MSA. More because I wanted to get the low notes and changes available on the B6/E9 tuning than anything. So yeah, I'm changing guitars because of the limitations of the Maverick, but it's more that I don't think it could handle the heavy gauge strings than a lack of changes available.
I paid wayyy too much for my Maverick, but only had about $300 of my own money into it, and a bunch of Guitar Center gift cards covered the rest. I _think_ I've played on it for about 6 years. My wife kind of wants me to sell it now that I've got the MSA, and I've had a few people ask about it that want to get into pedal steel. To be honest, I like the little guitar enough that I would probably not be happy to sell it for a fair price.
I'm no great shakes at the pedal steel myself, but I recently bought a S12 MSA. More because I wanted to get the low notes and changes available on the B6/E9 tuning than anything. So yeah, I'm changing guitars because of the limitations of the Maverick, but it's more that I don't think it could handle the heavy gauge strings than a lack of changes available.
I paid wayyy too much for my Maverick, but only had about $300 of my own money into it, and a bunch of Guitar Center gift cards covered the rest. I _think_ I've played on it for about 6 years. My wife kind of wants me to sell it now that I've got the MSA, and I've had a few people ask about it that want to get into pedal steel. To be honest, I like the little guitar enough that I would probably not be happy to sell it for a fair price.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: 6 Sep 2021 10:45 pm
- Location: South Australia
- Ryan Coplen
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 28 Oct 2021 7:15 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas
There was a gentleman on the SGForum (now deceased) named Ed Naylor who would soup-up your Maverick for you, adding levers, etc.
It would be worth taking a look at his posts/discussions, but here's a bit of what he said at one point:
"Practically all Mavericks I convert or sell parts for, are 3/4.Occasionally a 3/3. I use Super- Pro type changer fingers and R/L for 2-4-8 strings.All other fingers are modified to "Match" but are Raise only.The Bell Cranks are "Multi" position very similiar to what I use on the most expensive guitars."
As with so much on the SGF, there's a lot of wisdom and experience in the rear view mirror.
It would be worth taking a look at his posts/discussions, but here's a bit of what he said at one point:
"Practically all Mavericks I convert or sell parts for, are 3/4.Occasionally a 3/3. I use Super- Pro type changer fingers and R/L for 2-4-8 strings.All other fingers are modified to "Match" but are Raise only.The Bell Cranks are "Multi" position very similiar to what I use on the most expensive guitars."
As with so much on the SGF, there's a lot of wisdom and experience in the rear view mirror.
Undoubtedly the finest pedal steel player in Paris' 18th Arrondissement
Disaster of Touch, Tone & Taste; Still mastering the manifold mysteries of the Sho-Bud Maverick
Supro, Oahu, pin-striped Rus-Ler SD-10, y tiger-stripe-painted Stella
Hohner Corona Dos en Fa, y Gabanelli en Sol
Disaster of Touch, Tone & Taste; Still mastering the manifold mysteries of the Sho-Bud Maverick
Supro, Oahu, pin-striped Rus-Ler SD-10, y tiger-stripe-painted Stella
Hohner Corona Dos en Fa, y Gabanelli en Sol
- Todd Snelgrove
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 6 Nov 2021 9:46 am
- Location: Newfoundland, Canada
- Contact:
Wow. Thanks for that. That's a resource that I'm sure will be quite valuable.Bart Bull wrote:There was a gentleman on the SGForum (now deceased) named Ed Naylor who would soup-up your Maverick for you, adding levers, etc.
It would be worth taking a look at his posts/discussions, but here's a bit of what he said at one point:
"Practically all Mavericks I convert or sell parts for, are 3/4.Occasionally a 3/3. I use Super- Pro type changer fingers and R/L for 2-4-8 strings.All other fingers are modified to "Match" but are Raise only.The Bell Cranks are "Multi" position very similiar to what I use on the most expensive guitars."
As with so much on the SGF, there's a lot of wisdom and experience in the rear view mirror.
'72 Sho-Bud Maverick
- Patrick Huey
- Posts: 738
- Joined: 7 Nov 2014 8:38 am
- Location: Nacogdoches, Texas, USA
Re: Is my price too high?
That’s a very fair priceJeff Metz Jr. wrote:I am asking $500.00 for mine. Is that outrageous? Or is it a fair asking price?
Thanks
-Jeff
Pre RP Mullen D10 8/7, Zum 3/4, Carter S-10 3/4, previous Cougar SD-10 3/4 & GFI S-10 3/4, Fender Steel King, 2 Peavey Session 500's, Peavey Nashville 400, Boss DD-3, Profex-II, Hilton Digital Sustain, '88 Les Paul Custom,Epiphone MBIBG J-45, Fender Strat & Tele's, Takamine acoustics, Marshall amps, Boss effects, Ibanez Tube Screamer, and it all started with an old cranky worn out Kay acoustic you could slide a Mack truck between the strings and fretboard on!!
-
- Posts: 21192
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
A 3+1 is fine for learning the basics, and an awful lot can be played with that. In fact most of the stuff that Buddy Charleton cut with Ernest Tubb was done with a 3+1 setup on E9th. Here's some songs with some of my favorite Charleton rides:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSL4cR_UE-k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6id3Ik1hc
And here's one he did with Porter Wagoner (using no levers):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkjKOClJuvM
By the way Patrick, that ad is 10 years old, and that was a very good price back then. I'd put the value at least $700-$900 nowadays, but they sometimes bring far more for the right model in good conditions. (There were many different models and designs of Mavericks.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSL4cR_UE-k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6A6id3Ik1hc
And here's one he did with Porter Wagoner (using no levers):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkjKOClJuvM
By the way Patrick, that ad is 10 years old, and that was a very good price back then. I'd put the value at least $700-$900 nowadays, but they sometimes bring far more for the right model in good conditions. (There were many different models and designs of Mavericks.)
- Todd Snelgrove
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 6 Nov 2021 9:46 am
- Location: Newfoundland, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 21192
- Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.