Donny Hinson wrote:Tony Prior wrote:The bigger question is still, HOW much is the BAND making ? Not the individual player in the band....
The band? Who cares? I'm a sideman, and that's never an issue for me. As long as I'm getting paid what I want,
While that is certainly true with "the sideman/fill-in call" I doubt it is the case with the weekly Legion/Moose Halls bands. I suspect a majority of the members here fall into that category. Local 4 or 5 piece band that works together each week, same band, they are all part of the same band. They are not weekly sidemen.
thats what I am referring to.
IF players here are saying they are in a band and they are only making $35 on a gig I would like to hear from them about TOTAL BAND pay , or are they being discriminated against because they play Steel ? Everyone else is making $75 or $100 and only they are getting paid $35. Are they a member of the band or are they just an extra now and then ? Are they being paid $35 and the leader is making $100 or more ? Is this an every week occurrence ? They get paid less, everyone else gets paid more and they are part of the band ?
Like several in my area, I play venues in the regional weekly dance circuit, the more popular bands may get $100 more than the common bands, Meaning they may get paid $600 while everyone else get's $500 , mostly due to the draw at the door. A few of these bands have been on the circuit for many years, they earned it. The players earn well . The band leaders rely on QUALITY BAND members or the whole thing can go belly up really fast. They are each part of the band. They are not weekly sidemen.
I have no problem with a band leader drawing additional pay for the extra work, I didn't do that when I was leading. It's not an issue if he or she is paying band members appropriately. But there is a real danger to a local band that gigs 2 or 3 times a month with the same players, especially if each player has a dynamic role in the band . Said band leader can end up with NO band or a different band real fast which can lead to NO gigs and no pay for him as well. Seen it happen many times. A local band leader drawing extra pay with no band draws no pay ! It's a fine line for sure. I am referring to LOCAL BANDS on a monthly circuit, not various bands doing shows in the area.
We are all either in the band together or we are not. If we are not, and just a sideman getting a call for a one nighter, for certain thats a new set of rules and what Donny states is quite accurate.
So back to my original questions for those claiming to earn less because they play Steel.
Are you part of the band or a fill in now and then , not actually a band member .
Are you part of the band earning less because you play Steel and everyone else is earning more because they don't play Steel ?
Are you earning equal low pay because thats all the venues are willing to pay the band ?
All of this matters if we say we are earning less because we are Steel players. What is the reference ?