Comparison of Sho-Bud Pro III to other Sho-Buds

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

User avatar
Craig A Davidson
Posts: 3848
Joined: 16 Feb 2001 1:01 am
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin USA
Contact:

Post by Craig A Davidson »

All I know is that Pro2 Custom I just got that belonged to Lloyd Maines has got tone. So that must be the generation you speak of Ricky.
User avatar
Godfrey Arthur
Posts: 2997
Joined: 12 Dec 2012 5:46 pm
Location: 3rd Rock

Post by Godfrey Arthur »

Ricky Davis wrote:as soon as they got rid of the pin you hook the string on the finger;
In an effort to follow the mechanical discussion is this what is meant by "finger?"

Image
ShoBud The Pro 1
YES it's my REAL NAME!
Ezekiel 33:7
User avatar
Sergio Santos
Posts: 8
Joined: 12 Jun 2023 8:28 am
Location: Florida, USA

Post by Sergio Santos »

Barry Gaskell wrote:Hi Jim
I've had two pro III's, both pot metal with all the aforementioned problems. My first one was an absolutely superb guitar and had a sound to match and like any Bud, once you get to know them, they're wonderful beasts and each has it's own character.
The second one I had was a bit of a dog. Broke strings all over the place and couldn't hold a candle soundwise or mechanically to my first one. They looked almost identical, but were like chalk and cheese.
I now have a Super-Pro and it is absolute magic. It looks so cool, plays like butter, sounds like a Bud should do, stays in tune, doesn't break strings and because I know Buds pretty well inside out as a result of previous guitars, I can isolate and sort any problems out that may occur (which they haven't on the Super-Pro)
I would say with all Sho-Buds, treat each one individually, as a one off, because they are all different. One will just seem so right, whilst another just somehow doesn't.
You've just got to love a 'Bud
Best of luck in your search
Barry
. I just bought a Super Pro S10 and I'm glad to hear that I made a good choice.
Post Reply