Differences in width of Sho-Bud pedals

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Harry Dove
Posts: 289
Joined: 5 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Differences in width of Sho-Bud pedals

Post by Harry Dove »

I have noticed that Buds have pedal widths ranging from so wide they almost touch each other, to really skinny ones. I bought a mid 70's LDG and it has the skinny ones on it. They are probably not more than an inch wide. I'm finding the feel of it quite different than I'm used to. It is also quite easy to slip off a pedal after you have been moving back and forth between pedals for awhile. I find I have to constantly think about where my foot is positioned on the pedals. For those of you that have played guitars with the different pedals on them, is this something I'll get used to or would I be better off finding some wider pedals? If so, where can I find the pedals? I'm used to the medium width pedals on my Emmons.
Edward Rhea
Posts: 1181
Joined: 14 Mar 2013 6:36 pm
Location: Medford Oklahoma, USA

Post by Edward Rhea »

Harry, I've got a wide footprint, but still prefer the wider pedals. Every so often, people are looking to trade one style for the other, so that could be an option for you, if you decide that they just aren't cutting it?
Be aware though, there may be some modifications necessary, to make the swap! Good luck to you
“TONESNOB”
Jack Aldrich
Posts: 1004
Joined: 30 Apr 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Washington, USA

Post by Jack Aldrich »

I believe that the difference in pedal widths depends on the year of manufacture. I had a Pro I and have a Pro III, both from 1975, and both with wide pedals. The changeover happened in 1776 or 77.
Jack Aldrich
Carter & ShoBud D10's
D8 & T8 Stringmaster
Rickenbacher B6
3 Resonator guitars
Asher Alan Akaka Special SN 6
Canopus D8
User avatar
Jeff Mead
Posts: 1708
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 12:01 am
Location: London, England

Post by Jeff Mead »

Jack Aldrich wrote:I believe that the difference in pedal widths depends on the year of manufacture. I had a Pro I and have a Pro III, both from 1975, and both with wide pedals. The changeover happened in 1776 or 77.
My 6139 was built in August 1975 and has narrow pedals (unless they were swapped some time before I got it, I guess).
User avatar
Ian Worley
Posts: 2119
Joined: 14 Jan 2012 12:02 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Post by Ian Worley »

I also have a 12 string from June '75 that has narrow pedals. The change seems to correspond pretty closely with the switch to square front bodies but it seems there is always a lot of overlap with Sho-Buds.

There were two variants of the later narrow style pedals, one smooth, one with grooves but they were the same size. So if you ignore that variation there are really only two styles dating back to the early-mid '60s.

As with most things you would probably get used to the difference in time. The narrow pedals are actually closer together center to center than the old wide Bud pedals. As Edward mentioned, there are other things to consider if you want to change them.

The spacing on the axle was wider on the earlier models. On the earlier Professional/Pro series the spacing was ~2 5/8" - 2 3/4", The later narrow pedals were spaced 2 1/2". The narrow pedals are also a bit longer and mount lower on the pedal rack than the older style so the geometry is different relative to your foot/ankle.

Image
User avatar
Ian Rae
Posts: 5826
Joined: 10 Oct 2013 11:49 am
Location: Redditch, England
Contact:

Post by Ian Rae »

Jack Aldrich wrote:The changeover happened in 1776
No kidding, Jack :)
Make sleeping dogs tell the truth!
Homebuilt keyless U12 7x5, Excel keyless U12 8x8, Williams keyless U12 7x8, Telonics rack and 15" cabs
Rick Abbott
Posts: 2175
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 4:10 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Post by Rick Abbott »

The New Pedals were revolutionary at the time!
RICK ABBOTT
Sho~Bud D-10 Professional #7962
Remington T-8, Wakarusa 5e3 clone
1953 Stromberg-Carlson AU-35
User avatar
Ronnie Boettcher
Posts: 749
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Brunswick Ohio, USA

Post by Ronnie Boettcher »

I hear you saying if your foot moves a tiny bit, you miss one of the pedals, when using 2 at a time. It has happened to me. I traded my narrow ones, for wide ones on my LDG. No more missing a pedal. Now, if you think your spacing is too wide, you might have spacers between each pedal. Look and see. If you do, you can try removing them. A very easy task. Make sure you have them lubed so you do not get any wear. I was about to shorten the width of the pedals, to make them closer together, but I found a trade first. Even if you cut the width shorter, and do not like it, you can put spacers back in. Either way, you have to make them fit "YOU", not the other guys. Adjust your steel to fit you. Good luck friend Ronnie
Sho-Bud LDG, Martin D28, Ome trilogy 5 string banjo, Ibanez 4-string bass, dobro, fiddle, and a tubal cain. Life Member of AFM local 142
Harry Dove
Posts: 289
Joined: 5 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Post by Harry Dove »

Thanks for the info guys. Mine are also the smooth ones which may also contribute to sliding around on them. I guess there are some advantages to these pedals, like being easier to hit just one. I think I'll try them a while longer before I make any changes.
Jerry Hedge
Posts: 482
Joined: 14 Jan 1999 1:01 am
Location: Norwood Ohio U.S.A.

Post by Jerry Hedge »

I know what y'all mean about overlap. I have a '75 Pro III square body with wide pedals. I also have a '74 Pro III round body, with wide pedals. I've been playing wide pedals for so long it feels alien to play narrow pedals.
Post Reply