best distance between string and pickup

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Steven Welborn
Posts: 1315
Joined: 13 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Ojai,CA USA

best distance between string and pickup

Post by Steven Welborn »

since the magnetic flux of the pickup tends to work against a strings sustaining its vibration, anyone know the ideal distance between pickup and strings? OR...whats too close? Thanks.
User avatar
David Doggett
Posts: 8088
Joined: 20 Aug 2002 12:01 am
Location: Bawl'mer, MD (formerly of MS, Nawluns, Gnashville, Knocksville, Lost Angeles, Bahsten. and Philly)

Post by David Doggett »

The old rule of thumb is the thickness of two quarters for naked magnets, and the thickness of one quarter for covered pickups. For those outside the US, a quarter is a common medium-sized coin.
User avatar
Ricky Davis
Posts: 10964
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Bertram, Texas USA
Contact:

Post by Ricky Davis »

I personally don't go any closer than 3/16".


------------------
Ricky Davis
Image
Rebel™ and Ricky's Audio Clips
www.mightyfinemusic.com
Email Ricky: sshawaiian@austin.rr.com


Donny Hinson
Posts: 21192
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.

Post by Donny Hinson »

Steve, experiments I've done make me disagree with the many players and builders that say this is a significant problem. On a regular electric guitar, where the pickups are farther from the bridge, they do tend to reduce the vibration a little. But on a steel guitar, the pickup (there's only one) is very close to the bridge, so they just don't have as significant an effect. Like "cabinet drop", I think this is one of the factors that has been sort of "blown out of proportion" on steel guitars.

To do your own test, simply place a magnet near an open string at the nut-end of the guitar (at the same distance from the nut as your pickup is from the bridge). Then, strike the open string, and move the magnet closer and farther from the string.

Notice any significant difference?

Neither did I.
User avatar
Marco Schouten
Posts: 1866
Joined: 30 Mar 2000 1:01 am
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Post by Marco Schouten »

It depends on the pickup.

------------------
Steelin' Greetings
Marco Schouten
Sho-Bud LLG; Guyatone 6 string lap steel; John Pearse bar; Emmons bar; Evans SE200 amp


User avatar
Lee Baucum
Posts: 10326
Joined: 11 Apr 1999 12:01 am
Location: McAllen, Texas (Extreme South) The Final Frontier

Post by Lee Baucum »

In another thread, Ricky mentioned the thickness of three quarters as being a good distance between the magnets and the strings. I tried that on my Mullen (stock pickup) and am very pleased with the tone.

Lee, from South Texas
User avatar
Craig A Davidson
Posts: 3848
Joined: 16 Feb 2001 1:01 am
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin USA
Contact:

Post by Craig A Davidson »

How about a 17.5 TT and an 18.5 TT on a push-pull?
Steven Welborn
Posts: 1315
Joined: 13 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Ojai,CA USA

Post by Steven Welborn »

Thanks, that kind of clears it up. That makes sense Donny.
User avatar
Dennis Detweiler
Posts: 3488
Joined: 8 Dec 1998 1:01 am
Location: Solon, Iowa, US

Post by Dennis Detweiler »

I've never noticed any change in sustain with the pickup closer to the strings. However, I have experimented with tightening and loosening the neck screws with obvious results in sustain. But, here's a strange one: Very tight neck screws on aluminum necks will kill the sustain. Just barely snug is best. But, the opposite is true for wood neck guitars. I have a 1976 U-12 MSA with a wooden neck. I tightened the neck screws as tight as I could without stripping the screw heads. The sustain is unreal. Dennis
Ron Shepard
Posts: 145
Joined: 14 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Easthampton, MA, USA

Post by Ron Shepard »

Well, after reading this post I decided to check the height of my pick ups in relation to the strings. By lowering them to about two or three quarters thickness.... I CAN'T BELIEVE THE DIFFERENCE IT MADE! in clarity
sustain, everything. The highs are where they are supposed be and the lows as well.
since then I have eliminated the effects and am now playing with just my guitar and amp with now, less reverb. Thanks for this post
and to Dennis, I also loosened the screws a bit on the underside of the necks(they were
very tight) that contibuted to this huge difference I now have in sound.
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21192
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.

Post by Donny Hinson »

<SMALL>By lowering them to about two or three quarters thickness....</SMALL>
Gosh Ron, How close were they to begin with? Image I've never been able to set mine any closer than two-quarters (a little over an eighth inch) because they hit the pickup when my hand touches the strings. I've found on all my guitars (MSA, Emmons, Marlen) that anything between an eighth inch and a quarter inch works pretty well, so I settled on three sixteenths.
Ron Shepard
Posts: 145
Joined: 14 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Easthampton, MA, USA

Post by Ron Shepard »

Donny, they were too close, thats my 75 cents
worth. Image
Post Reply