independent tone control

Steel guitar amplifiers, effects, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Thomas Webb
Posts: 20
Joined: 1 Dec 2009 10:42 am
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada

independent tone control

Post by Thomas Webb »

Hello

Just wondering if anyone has ever come across an independent tone control unit, perhaps something that could be mounted on the leg of a steel to achieve a lap steel type, boo-wah effect. Check out the video, and see what Buddy Merrill does at 0:50.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RF05gVe47S4

I am assuming that control is likely part of the guitar, but id be interested in one that mounts on the leg and could be used on different guitars.

Thanks very much

Tom
User avatar
Paul Brainard
Posts: 620
Joined: 6 Feb 2000 1:01 am
Location: Portland OR
Contact:

tone control

Post by Paul Brainard »

Goodrich made one - I have one although haven't seen too many around. Just a plain, passive tone control - wouldn't be too hard to make one, all you need is a pot and a capacitor, and a project box and a leg clip (George L I think sells those. . )
User avatar
Scott Duckworth
Posts: 3470
Joined: 6 Apr 2013 8:41 am
Location: Etowah, TN Western Foothills of the Smokies
Contact:

Post by Scott Duckworth »

Here's a circuit for a "treble and bass" control. Build it in a small box. You might have to play with the values of the capacitors to get what you want.


Image
Amateur Radio Operator NA4IT (Extra)
http://www.qsl.net/na4it

I may, in fact, be nuts. However, I am screwed onto the right bolt... Jesus!
User avatar
Jeff Mead
Posts: 1708
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 12:01 am
Location: London, England

Post by Jeff Mead »

I suspect it might not be in the ideal position to use it like Buddy did if it was mounted on the leg.

Have you considered one of the volume/tone pedals which had the tone control from side to side. Bigsby, Fender and DeArmond all used to make them. Nobody makes one now but used ones do come up fairly regularly. Fender re-issued theirs a few year back but have now discontinued that too but they are probably the easiest to find.

Personally, I find it much easier to operate the Boo-Wah with my foot.

If you don't use volume swells (as many lap players don't) you could convert a volume only pedal to tone only pretty easily.
User avatar
Paul Brainard
Posts: 620
Joined: 6 Feb 2000 1:01 am
Location: Portland OR
Contact:

Post by Paul Brainard »

It's true the leg-mounted position isn't all that convenient for boo-wah-ing. A tone-only pedal is a great idea, or you could also have a tone control installed on your guitar. Or maybe some kind of surface-mounted box??
User avatar
Erv Niehaus
Posts: 26797
Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
Location: Litchfield, MN, USA

Post by Erv Niehaus »

Goodrich's Match Box has a tone control on it and it attaches to the leg. Why couldn't that be used?
User avatar
Jeff Mead
Posts: 1708
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 12:01 am
Location: London, England

Post by Jeff Mead »

Erv Niehaus wrote:Goodrich's Match Box has a tone control on it and it attaches to the leg. Why couldn't that be used?
Not a dramatic enough tone change for the effect and even if it was, not positioned well enough.

As in interesting aside, because of impedance or something, if you do use a Matchbox then the tone part of a volume/tone pedal has zero effect.
Bruce Derr
Posts: 765
Joined: 26 Nov 2001 1:01 am
Location: Lee, New Hampshire, USA

Post by Bruce Derr »

Jeff Mead wrote: As in interesting aside, because of impedance or something, if you do use a Matchbox then the tone part of a volume/tone pedal has zero effect.
It is indeed because of impedance. The low impedance output of a buffer makes the signal essentially immune to the treble-reducing effect of cable capacitance... and of tone control capacitors as well.
User avatar
Mike Perlowin
Posts: 15171
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Perlowin »

Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.
Please visit my web site and Soundcloud page and listen to the music posted there.
http://www.mikeperlowin.com http://soundcloud.com/mike-perlowin
User avatar
Mike Perlowin
Posts: 15171
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Perlowin »

Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.
Please visit my web site and Soundcloud page and listen to the music posted there.
http://www.mikeperlowin.com http://soundcloud.com/mike-perlowin
User avatar
Jeff Mead
Posts: 1708
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 12:01 am
Location: London, England

Post by Jeff Mead »

Mike Perlowin wrote:Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.
It's a completely different sound - active boost rather than passive. OK if that's what you want but it wont sound like the clip the OP posted.
User avatar
Jack Hanson
Posts: 5024
Joined: 19 Jun 2012 3:42 pm
Location: San Luis Valley, USA

Post by Jack Hanson »

Jeff Mead wrote:
Mike Perlowin wrote:Wouldn't it ne simpler just to hook up a wah wah pedal next to the volume pedal?

Some guys already do this.
It's a completely different sound - active boost rather than passive. OK if that's what you want but it wont sound like the clip the OP posted.
To carry this discussion one step further, how difficult would it be to convert a donor Vox, Cry Baby, Dunlop, etc. pedal from its active wah circuit to a passive tone control circuit? In addition, could you retain the pedal's original on/off switch to cut the effect in and out as needed? Being a passive circuit, would the pedal be considered "true bypass" when the pot and cap are switched off?
User avatar
Lane Gray
Posts: 13551
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Topeka, KS

Post by Lane Gray »

Jack, the answer to the difficulty question is "deaf easy."
The true bypass question would depend on how you wired it.
2 pedal steels, a lapStrat, and an 8-string Dobro (and 3 ukes)
More amps than guitars, and not many effects
User avatar
Jeff Mead
Posts: 1708
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 12:01 am
Location: London, England

Post by Jeff Mead »

I think true bypass might be overcomplicating it - we're only trying to duplicate the sound of a Stringmaster tone control after all.
User avatar
Lane Gray
Posts: 13551
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Topeka, KS

Post by Lane Gray »

But since the tone knob bleeds highs to ground, true bypass is probably a very easy thing to do.
Switch off; essentially a straight wire from J1 to J2, engaged, pot and cap shunt to ground
2 pedal steels, a lapStrat, and an 8-string Dobro (and 3 ukes)
More amps than guitars, and not many effects
Thomas Webb
Posts: 20
Joined: 1 Dec 2009 10:42 am
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada

Post by Thomas Webb »

Thanks for all the feedback guys, some great ideas here! very much appreciated.

Tom
User avatar
Brad Sarno
Posts: 4916
Joined: 18 Dec 2000 1:01 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by Brad Sarno »

User avatar
Jeff Mead
Posts: 1708
Joined: 15 Jun 2006 12:01 am
Location: London, England

Post by Jeff Mead »

Brad Sarno wrote:Tone control and buffer
http://www.sarnomusicsolutions.com/products/fl.html
I'd certainly be interested to see a demo of this being used in the style of the original clip.
Jack Stanton
Posts: 1894
Joined: 6 May 2007 7:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey

Post by Jack Stanton »

Or you could just by yourself an Emmons guitar.
User avatar
Paul Brainard
Posts: 620
Joined: 6 Feb 2000 1:01 am
Location: Portland OR
Contact:

Post by Paul Brainard »

What about something based on the idea of a Theramin, but instead of controlling the pitch or volume it controls the tone (or assign it to a freqency sweep, really whatever you want. . .) So you could do the boo-wah thing without a knob, just by waving your hand around. Sure would look cool, anyway.
Thomas Webb
Posts: 20
Joined: 1 Dec 2009 10:42 am
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada

Post by Thomas Webb »

This looks great Brad, do you have any clips of it in action and could it be used to achieve the boo-wah effect?

Thanks Tom
Post Reply