2017 , is it worth the upgrade ?

Q&A about PGMusic's popular accompaniment software

Moderator: David Collins

Post Reply
User avatar
Tony Prior
Posts: 14522
Joined: 17 Oct 2001 12:01 am
Location: Charlotte NC
Contact:

2017 , is it worth the upgrade ?

Post by Tony Prior »

I am running the full blown 2013 PAK on a HD, with Real this Real that, tons of really nice stuff.

What would be the benefit of going to 2017 ?
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders
Pro Tools 8 and Pro Tools 12
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 8 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
User avatar
Jack Stoner
Posts: 22087
Joined: 3 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Jack Stoner »

Depends on what and how much you use it.
I upgraded from an older than yours version (thought it was time). Don't see a lot of visual changes, although there probably is "under the hood".
GFI Ultra Keyless S-10 with pad (Black of course) TB202 amp, Hilton VP, Steelers Choice sidekick seat, SIT Strings (all for sale as package)
Cakewalk by Bandlab and Studio One V4.6 pro DAWs, MOTU Ultralite MK5 recording interface unit
User avatar
Tony Prior
Posts: 14522
Joined: 17 Oct 2001 12:01 am
Location: Charlotte NC
Contact:

Post by Tony Prior »

I hear ya Jack, I have no issues with 2013, I use it for drum programming and for practice tracks. Just wondering out loud. I'm barely touching the surface of what it offers !

I don't see me spending yet another $169 for a full upgrade.

If it had something WAY different included that would be a different story.
Emmons L-II , Fender Telecasters, B-Benders
Pro Tools 8 and Pro Tools 12
jobless- but not homeless- now retired 8 years

CURRENT MUSIC TRACKS AT > https://tprior2241.wixsite.com/website
User avatar
Carl Kilmer
Posts: 2691
Joined: 7 Aug 2008 1:23 pm
Location: East Central, Illinois

Post by Carl Kilmer »

The last one I got was the 2010.5 Everything Pak on a hard drive.
I've hardly ever used it. Every year they add a little more to it and
after a few years you have a lot invested in it that could be used for
for some equipment you could get a lot of use out of. There's a lot
of super good tracks available both purchase and for free that I can
enjoy and use for teaching. For the cost of upgrading every year, an
old man on S/S can sure buy a years worth of tracks and strings.
aka "Lucky Kay"--Custom built Rittenberry SD10 3X5, Walker S/S, NV-112, and Hilton Pedal
User avatar
Jim Smerk
Posts: 173
Joined: 6 Feb 2014 7:29 pm
Location: Ohio, USA
Contact:

Post by Jim Smerk »

Carl, what you say is 100% true, but like you said, if you don't use it why would you upgrade at all? :lol:

For folks that DO use it the 2017 is a worthy upgrade, especially for folks that have 2012 or earlier AND use it a lot.
Harry Dove
Posts: 289
Joined: 5 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Post by Harry Dove »

Don't know that I would recommend upgrading every year, but if you have a version that is a few years old it is definitely worth it. What you can do with 2017 is almost mind boggling. I think they are getting more user friendly all the time as well. Some of the plugins let you create your own effects rack, amp modeling, etc. You can import recorded songs and almost instantly create chord charts of exactly how the song was recorded. That alone can save you a ton of time when trying to learn a new song. I know I plan to spend some time learning a lot more about the program. It's time well spent.
User avatar
Bob Muller
Posts: 891
Joined: 9 Jan 2008 11:50 am
Location: Oregon, USA

Post by Bob Muller »

I had the 2011 version, just got the 2017 about 2 weeks ago. 2017 seems to have a lot more options and sounds very good. I still need to spend more time learning, but there is a lot of online info to help. I think it is a great up grade.
Harry Dove
Posts: 289
Joined: 5 Sep 1998 12:01 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Post by Harry Dove »

Have any of you run the latest update? A couple days ago the box popped up telling me there was an update to install. When it installed it really changed the appearance of the display and where the tools are located. It made it look more like the 2016 version. This is probably more user friendly to those who haven't used the program much, but I kind of miss how compact the 2017 version was before.
Post Reply