Sho~Bud 6139 and 6140 Question

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

User avatar
b0b
Posts: 29108
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, CA, USA
Contact:

Post by b0b »

I loved my Sho~Bud 6139!

Image
-𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video
User avatar
Tom Quinn
Posts: 2753
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm

Post by Tom Quinn »

Ya got BIG hands there Bobster... ;- )
I need an Emmons!
Pete Burak
Posts: 6530
Joined: 2 Oct 1998 12:01 am
Location: Portland, OR USA

Post by Pete Burak »

Is that a non-Gumby key-head, b0b?
User avatar
Ken Pippus
Posts: 2618
Joined: 8 Feb 2007 7:55 am
Location: Langford, BC, Canada

Post by Ken Pippus »

Gumby, but hard to see.
Skip Edwards
Posts: 3009
Joined: 1 Dec 1998 1:01 am
Location: LA,CA

Post by Skip Edwards »

Why aren't the pots & tap switch in their usual spot... centered on the back shelf?
User avatar
b0b
Posts: 29108
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Cloverdale, CA, USA
Contact:

Post by b0b »

Built in early 1974 - that's how they made them then.
-𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video
Jerry Malvern
Posts: 463
Joined: 30 Apr 2005 12:01 am
Location: Menifee, California, USA
Contact:

Post by Jerry Malvern »

Didn't come with strap locks so you could play it standing up either! :D
Chris Sattler
Posts: 390
Joined: 21 Sep 2011 7:23 am
Location: Hunter Valley, Australia

Post by Chris Sattler »

Jeff Mead wrote:
Lane Gray wrote:Almost certainly. 6139 by definition was 3 & 1. HOWEVER, I'm not sure that they'd have changed the model number if someone ordered a 6139 with more knees.
So was it considered a student model? Hard to imagine Sho~Bud in the mid 70's selling a pro model with only 3x1.
Hi Jeff. My first guitar was a blonde Bud late 70's. It was a 3 X 1 pro model and I had Kenny Kitching add two more levers when I found it was lacking horsepower. Definitely not a student model but I didn't know that at the time and I could easily have got one without realising. I don't recall the model number, but I know now it was a really nice guitar. I'd love it back or one like it. It had lovely inlay work which went unappreciated then.
I think it cost me about $1100 AUS then from a shop in Park St Sydney near Town Hall Station
User avatar
Allan Kirby
Posts: 40
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 9:09 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Allan Kirby »

My 1974 Sho-Bud model 6139 came originally with 3 pedals and 1 lever. Two more levers were added a few years later. As you can see in the photo, the added levers do not have the teardrop design that the original lever had, but they work well and I do not intend to change them.

My Bud is a solid 3x3 guitar with nice action and great tone. I work a few gigs a years with it to keep it active. I play about 60 times a year and while the 6139 is not my "go to" guitar, I really enjoy playing the occasionally gig with it.
Image
Image
User avatar
Willis Vanderberg
Posts: 2389
Joined: 13 Mar 2002 1:01 am
Location: Petoskey Mi

Post by Willis Vanderberg »

The most stupid thing I ever did was let a famous ShoBud person talk me into letting them install their new under carriage on my 6139. Not only ruined the sound but put two big scratches on my fret board. Then they generously offered to replace the fret board for thirty five bucks. This was to take about three months, I waited a year for it. After driving to Nashville twice,about 1600 mile I felt I was Ripped off. My over all experience with Nashvilles finest steel guitar mechanics left a lot to be desired.
Post Reply