Brucie, did you even read where I said:Bruce Bouton wrote:
Restaurants and bars don't have to pay much. Many are exempt from paying anything. Creators should be paid. Donnie if you think we're getting too much oh well.
This is how I've made my living. Seems like many of the posters know all about music royalties and have very strong opinions. Can't argue with that:)
B
and...Donny Hinson wrote:I think that songwriters should be paid when someone records their songs, and sells them for a profit."
Typically, whenever "big business" gets involved (and I don't care what kind of big business we're talking about), the big business grows and grows, and the little guy winds up getting screwed. That's what capitalism in this country has come to mean.Donny Hinson wrote:As I said before, artists and writers should get their due, but in many cases, that doesn't seem to be happening.
"Restaurants and bars don't have to pay much."
Then why are they complaining about the fees and cutting out live music? Believe it or not, $150 or $200 a month can be significant for a small business. But you know that, because you were once just a bar/club player...like most of the guys on here.
'Course, it could be you're on the "other side" now, so you're seeing things differently.
Oh, and by the way I BUY my music. I'm still BUYING CD's and records. I don't do downloads, the Ipod, Spotify, Rhapsody, or Pandora stuff, and have no desire to. I've BOUGHT thousands of records and many hundreds of CD's, including several of Ricky Skaggs records and CD's, and I even BOUGHT your steel guitar course when it first came out. And, most all of the playing I do now is for nothing, so my conscience is clear. From what you're saying, it looks like the labels and publishers that are still really getting the lion's share of the money, so that hasn't really changed much in a hundred years.
Just follow the money, the big money, and you'll see who's (still) doing the real screwing.
I'm done with this topic.