Author |
Topic: A=432 vs A=440 |
Joey Ace
From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 6:22 am
|
|
I occasionally play in a Classic Country band where the leader/front man wants to tune to 432.
No big deal for me. A few buttons on the Peterson tuner and I'm there.
I thought it was an odd quirk, but if he's more comfortable about a third of a tone below standard all's good.
I mentioned this to another band leader last night, a 440 guy, and he was intrigued.
He sent me this link:
http://www.viewzone.com/432hertz222.html
What your experience with 432? It get's deeper than I ever imagined. (Did Lennon record Imagine at 432?)
Was changing the standard to 440 Hz in 1939, responsible for a negative effect on today's culture?
The article in the link suggests that.
My head hurts, and I have a four hour matinee with the 432 guy later today. |
|
|
|
Jack Stoner
From: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 6:34 am
|
|
I read that Buck Owens' band often tuned open to Eb instead of E.
Johnny Cash sang Folsom Prison Blues in F, not E as most do or assumed. I've watched videos of Luther Perkins playing it and he was apparently tuned to F as it looked like he was playing in E, and not with a capo. |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 7:19 am
|
|
I had a disterous experience with a cantor at something higher than 432, but it was with a piano so that's beside the point...
... except to say that's it's likely that Mozart's piano was tuned at 432 to reduce stress on antique pianos rather than a harmonious universe.
If there were any truth to the article, we should tune to 430 and be even healthier.
At it's end, "Next up is a review of hard scientific evidence of the benefits from listening to 432..."
Yes, hard to believe.
The writer also says that Led Zep recorded 'No Quarter' at 432 "... but I could not find any validation to this claim."
At the very least, Joey, if any of it's true, your headache will be less at the end of the show.
Certainly, all this stuff gives me one, it gets so 'deep.' _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
Ken Pippus
From: Langford, BC, Canada
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 7:23 am
|
|
Hendrix and Stevie Ray tuned to Eb. Flatt and Scruggs tuned to almost (but not quite) F. Tuning an instrument to a different pitch with the same strings can produce a significant change in timbre: think high lonesome vs. fine and mellow. These changes would be expected to impact a sensitive listener. It's also a lot easier to stretch a .012 E string a whole tone when you're tuned lower.
I think it's a stretch to invoke right brain specific frequencies, or a function (very arbitrarily derived) with respect to the earth's rotation cycle, or the potential harmonic sympathy with whale song to explain the effect of changing tuning. |
|
|
|
Joachim Kettner
From: Germany
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 7:58 am
|
|
Quote: |
Did Lennon record Imagine at 432? |
I don't believe that there were already any electronical tuners on the market in '71. Maybe the piano was not up to pitch. Charlie should know. _________________ Fender Kingman, Sierra Crown D-10, Evans Amplifier, Soup Cube. |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 8:46 am
|
|
I think there was a Peterson strobe in use at the time, but not sure; would have been in use by piano and guitar techs before my time.
The recording of 'Imagine' that I have is on standard pitch in C, the key Lennon would have played in.
However, I just found another recording on Utube that's almost in B; same piano, same recording, same effects, but a little slower in tempo.
Maybe the recording was remastered?
The timbre of the piano is of an old one not up to pitch, but that's pretty subjective without proof. It sounds better in the higher key. _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
Joachim Kettner
From: Germany
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 9:14 am
|
|
"Misery" by the Beatles is also at a lower pitch. I had to tune my guitar to 435 Hz, to play along in tune.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzxdApFBBGQ
Btw, it was a white Steinway on which he played "Imagine"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/029ae/029ae10f071185b16560c50b515d752dab03b336" alt="" _________________ Fender Kingman, Sierra Crown D-10, Evans Amplifier, Soup Cube. |
|
|
|
Donny Hinson
From: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
|
Posted 1 Nov 2015 5:06 pm
|
|
IMHO, this 432hz hocus-pocus is based on the earth-frequency resonance of 8 hz...which it isn't. It's supposed to be 7.86hz (so physicist Winnifred Schumann said, anyway) which has no harmonic relationship with either 432hz or 440hz. As in the digital world, a harmonic or digital "miss" of .14hz is as good as a mile. The examples with the standing waves on the metal plate are also something I suspect as gobbledegook, since they use the same (size) plate for both frequencies. I'll bet you dollars to donuts I can size a plate that will give nice complete patterns at 440hz, and incomplete ones at 432hz, so that exercise proves, essentially, nothing.
Newsflash!
(Hot off the web)
Quote: |
There is concrete evidence to suggest that Mother Earth herself is shifting her vibration, in order to adapt to the paradigm shift. The Schumann Frequencies are the ‘sound’ of the earth. It’s like hearing the sound of a big drum, with that drum being the earth’s resonant cavity. Only a few years ago the earth was vibrating at around 7.8 hertz, but a few days ago, the Schumann frequency hit 16.5. This demonstrates that the earth itself is changing. |
Well, I guess that revelation just shot the "magic 432hz" theory in the ass.
Maybe we can do something with 13hz? (13hz x 34 =442hz):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_XZl-DwXls
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/452fc/452fcd5b9305db9f1f4210a8a341a9c886347689" alt="Oh Well" |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 2 Nov 2015 3:18 am
|
|
Quote: |
This demonstrates that the earth itself is changing. |
Standard pitch has changed along with it, but not due to changes in the earth--more like changes in strengths of instruments.
'A' was 435 before it was 440; it was once 400. Orchestras kept getting brighter and brighter, and now we play around with 442.
Thinking that these changes affect us... it's more likely that the changes mirror us, reflect the times and the increased pace of life.
That increase has been going on since the beginning of history; to suggest that it's causal--probably not good reflecting or observation.
Meanwhile, the gateway to the subconscious is more like 6 or 7 Hz, not 13, but the sound of the Tibetan bowls is pretty, and relaxing--for some.
Looking for a magic number in the universe to tune to is like... I don't know. People will probably keep looking.
Perhaps they should look at the increasing frequency of the red shift. No wonder people listen to bowls.
I think I like dance music more, but it's a nice change. _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
Joey Ace
From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted 2 Nov 2015 4:32 am
|
|
Thanks for the interesting replies.
I believe it's simply that this singer believes his voice resonates better at 432. He even told me that's the reason.
Since humans are not all the same it makes sense for him.
It did make it impossible to accompany a guitar playing guest. He did his songs solo.
I'm pleased to say changing from 440 to 432 did not require any tweaking of my pedals and levers. |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 6 Nov 2015 4:20 am
|
|
Too late to be of any help, Joey, but here's a link I ran across: 432HZ DNA REPAIR- SLEEP [ 4 hours ] Delta 3hz
There are many more vids listed with 432 'music,' not to mention 936 Hz.
I still don't get it. Four hours of it probably won't convince me. _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 6 Nov 2015 7:27 am
|
|
The 432 Hz theory is pseudoscience. A bunch of baloney.
However, a singer who feels that his voice resonates better in the space between the 440 ET notes may have a better ear than most people. I know that certain songs I sing would be a lot easier if the high G was just a wee bit lower.
John Lennon often changed tape speeds to get the effect he wanted, most famously in Strawberry Fields Forever. _________________ -𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 6 Nov 2015 7:37 am
|
|
That may explain the discrepancy about 'Imagine.'
The cantor that wanted the piano's pitch lowered [the one where I broke an agraffe (string tree)]: he sang me his A; had to get his sound. _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
Luke Sullivan
From: El Paso de Robles, CA, USA
|
Posted 6 Nov 2015 8:12 am Vocal muscle memory
|
|
A half step is ok w/ me, but in-between, I resist. Ab is 415.305Hz. If muscle memory allows us to sing on pitch at will, vocalizing at A432 is unusual, for me,and makes for reduced strength in the notes. I find pitch by adjusting tension in the airway. Practicing with scales, on pitch, gives power and accuracy. Some under-pitched pianos are out there. Before we had electric tuners, everyone just tuned to their own pitch. I guess I'm talking about us folksingers, not real musicians. ...bOb, I can barely screech the E; you tenors are rare and valuable around here. _________________ Mullen PRP D10, accordions, Harmony Sovereign guitar. |
|
|
|
Dustin Rhodes
From: Owasso OK
|
Posted 6 Nov 2015 8:50 am
|
|
There are a million songs out there where the tapes were sped up or slowed down to suit what they wanted. No crazy intentions with the tuning played a part. They usually wanted it faster or slower for a different feel. |
|
|
|
Donny Hinson
From: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.
|
Posted 7 Nov 2015 8:15 am
|
|
Bingo Dustin! Too many people just automatically assume it was the player or singer that changed the tuning, when it reality, it was the studio changing the recording/playback speed to get a different sound, or shorten the duration of the song. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aa8e/5aa8e831990e8a2e49bbd10dd4248902d1f3a9f6" alt="Wink" |
|
|
|
b0b
From: Cloverdale, CA, USA
|
Posted 7 Nov 2015 1:03 pm Re: Vocal muscle memory
|
|
Luke Sullivan wrote: |
...bOb, I can barely screech the E; you tenors are rare and valuable around here. |
I'm not a tenor. G is my highest note, and that's on a good day, with a lot of air behind it. From what I've read, that makes me a lyric baritone.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baritone#Lyric
"The lyric baritone is a sweeter, milder sounding baritone voice, lacking in harshness; lighter and perhaps mellower than the dramatic baritone with a higher tessitura. Its common range is from the A below low C to the G above middle C (A2 to G4). It is typically assigned to comic roles." data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40e85/40e85c56655a5577f14250da0762594ade88330f" alt="Laughing" _________________ -𝕓𝕆𝕓- (admin) - Robert P. Lee - Recordings - Breathe - D6th - Video |
|
|
|
Charlie McDonald
From: out of the blue
|
Posted 9 Nov 2015 4:03 am
|
|
Yeah, that Figaro was a riot. _________________ Those that say don't know; those that know don't say.--Buddy Emmons |
|
|
|
Luke Sullivan
From: El Paso de Robles, CA, USA
|
Posted 9 Nov 2015 8:12 am Yodel dee doo
|
|
The upper vocal range can be extended by a gradual movement into high-voice. After years of yodeling, I find it challenging to transition into falsetto seamlessly. Yodeling is one way to get attention. Yodels are useful guit-licks. Following the link, I learned that Barbershop high 10'ers sing in falsetto. _________________ Mullen PRP D10, accordions, Harmony Sovereign guitar. |
|
|
|
Steve Duke
From: Missouri, USA
|
Posted 13 Nov 2015 7:55 am A=432 vs A=440
|
|
Funny this thread would appear. I bought a music book at a yard sale this summer for a quarter. The Eleanor Smith Music Course-Book Four. Last week I picked it up and was thumbing through it and found a passage THE RUDIMENTS OF MUSIC. A paragraph read "The pitch of a tone is its highness or lowness, and depends on the frequency of the vibrations producing the tone. The standard of pitch quite generally adopted is 435 A". This book was copyright 1908 by Eleanor Smith. FYI |
|
|
|
Don Griffiths
From: Steelville, MO
|
Posted 2 Dec 2015 4:10 pm
|
|
Great thread. I've been wanting to research this further.I do believe there is more to it than meets the ear.There are frequencies that are more pleasant. Don't musicians know this? They have actually healed human DNA at 528 hz. I thought all musicians were hip to this. The official term for this science is Cymatics, though having a scientific name doesn't necessarily make it more or less factual. Anyhow if Tesla and Einstein were backing it up I call it more than pseudoscience. Though I have to admit they lose me when they start referring to chakras.
http://educateinspirechange.org/science-technology/heres-convert-music-432-hz/
And of course like any new little understood technology,the benefits are oversold and overstated.
https://wholetones.com
And my curiosity with it is how does this tie in with just intonation and tuning and also the solfeggio scale??
I maybe wrongly assumed they were referring to J.I. when talking about the 432 hz shift.
And then there are the plant experiments where plants responded and grew positively better when exposed to classical music. Then when exposed to Heavy Metal their growth slowed or withered. There is definitely more to this than we currently know. Unfortunately everything I'm finding on the internet is followed by outrageous claims and a sales pitch.
I happen to have an extra set of solfeggio tuning forks I would reluctantly let go of for the right price that will produce a halo around the subject when finished using them. Check this out!
http://www.somaenergetics.com/solfeggio_frequencies.php
http://www.somaenergetics.com/products.php data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40e85/40e85c56655a5577f14250da0762594ade88330f" alt="Laughing" _________________ Shobud Pro1,BMI U12, Santa Cruz F, PRS Standard, Fender Twin Reverb, ‘53 000-28 |
|
|
|