Carter Starter vs. Maverick 3&2

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
Thomas Webb
Posts: 20
Joined: 1 Dec 2009 10:42 am
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada

Carter Starter vs. Maverick 3&2

Post by Thomas Webb »

Hello all

A friend of mine is interested in getting a entry steel guitar and has an opportunity to buy a 65 or 66 Maverick with 3 pedals and 2 knees or a carter starter in great shape with an upgraded George Ls pickup. Both are around the same price point. Any thoughts on what would be a superior guitar?

Thanks

Tom
User avatar
John Booth
Posts: 2036
Joined: 25 Oct 2014 9:17 am
Location: Columbus Ohio, USA

Post by John Booth »

I'd go for the carter
Jb in Ohio
..................................
GFI S10 Ultra, Telecaster, a Hound Dog, and an Annoyed Wife
..................................
User avatar
Jerome Hawkes
Posts: 1385
Joined: 8 May 2009 7:16 am
Location: Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA

Post by Jerome Hawkes »

if its the wood body maverick, go for that one. condition considering - you can sink a lot of $$ into a 40 old shobud getting it playable
if its the more common later wallpaper covered one, id go for the carter, esp if its in A+ playable condition
i don't think they made the maverick in 65/66 - more likely from 70's
'65 Sho-Bud D-10 Permanent • '54 Fender Dual-8 • Clinesmith T-8 • '38 Ric Bakelite • '92 Emmons D-10 Legrande II
User avatar
Charlie McDonald
Posts: 11054
Joined: 17 Feb 2005 1:01 am
Location: out of the blue

Post by Charlie McDonald »

I think Jerome is right.
The George L might make the difference in the Starter,
as tempting as it would be to own a 'Sho Bud' with only 2 levers.
James Wolf
Posts: 223
Joined: 31 Jan 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Georgia

Post by James Wolf »

I spent my first 4 years as a pedal steel guitar player on a carter starter. I tried out a maverick once during that time and had such a hard time with it that I ran home and hugged my starter. My vote is for the carter starter if those are your only two choices.
User avatar
Dan Auldridge
Posts: 303
Joined: 22 Aug 2014 11:43 am
Location: Poteet Tx. USA

pedal steel

Post by Dan Auldridge »

I think if I was starting up I would go wiyh a stage one. 3+4 and new for about the same cost
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21192
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.

Post by Donny Hinson »

Mavs can be good...or bad, but the CS, if nothing else, is consistent. Either one should keep a beginner going for a couple of years.
Dean Holman
Posts: 647
Joined: 7 Dec 2007 3:50 pm
Location: Branson MO

Post by Dean Holman »

I may be a little prejudiced in saying this being that here recently I've been helping Doug Earnest with the Stage One and Encore guitars. All I have to say is you will be pulling your hair out with a Maverick and Carter Starter. PLEASE, spend what little extra it might cost to get the Stage One. I know firsthand the Quality that goes into these guitars and they come with 3 pedals and 4 knees and the tone of these guitars are incredible.
Post Reply