The Steel Guitar Forum Store 

Post new topic LeGrande Pedal Action?
Reply to topic
Author Topic:  LeGrande Pedal Action?
Bob Snelgrove


From:
san jose, ca
Post  Posted 30 Nov 2003 9:52 am    
Reply with quote

Hi Gang

How would you rate the feel of the LG pedals and knee levers? I have a Franklin, Mullen, and P/P. The Franklin defies the laws of physics, the Mullen is tight, smooth, and precise and the P/P is, well. a P/P I'd like to know how a new LG compares to a Carter, as well?

thx

bob
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Wayne Baker


From:
Altus Oklahoma
Post  Posted 30 Nov 2003 1:39 pm    
Reply with quote

Bob, I have a Legrande and a p/p, and they both have basically the same pedal action (butter) due to the Bobbe Seymour maintenance videos and a little oil. If I could only make them sound like he was playing them....

Wayne Baker
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

C Dixon

 

From:
Duluth, GA USA
Post  Posted 30 Nov 2003 2:13 pm    
Reply with quote

My LeGrande has much better pedal action than I ever got on my P/P. This is of course due in most part because of necessary slop in the pedals when strings are raised AND lowered. Also because they must have two stops, the P/P's have always felt a bit spongy to me.

My Sierra pedals were much too stiff. This I feel was due to the scale length. Which I also believe caused premature string breakage.

My Excel pedals "feel" fall somewhere between the P/P and my LeGrande. This will change drastically as I convert the undercarriage to Emmons belcranks; because they will allow perfect "timing" of all pulls; which plays a major role in the feel of a pedal on a PSG.

Since I never played a Mullen or Zum or Shobud etc, I can only state what I feel just engaging their pedals at conventions going from one booth to the other.

Considering this, I would rate the Mullen an absolute dream in this respect. The Zum not far behind. I do not like the fact that the Zum's (I have seen) have NO return spring on the crossbar cranks. So I would have to favor the Mullen over any pedal I have ever pressed.

Any Sho-Bud pedal I have sat down to has been a bit too stiff for my tastes. The Carter is the ONLY guitar I have ever sat down to that made me feel like it was meant for for me.

I do not however like its sound or some of the mechanical things. But I believe it has the best shaped pedals of any PSG being produced today. I have never sat down to a Franklin so I have to reserve judgement on their pedal action. This goes for all the others too; as well as the new MSA. I have never engaged their pedals so I have no idea what they feel like.

carl
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website

Bob Snelgrove


From:
san jose, ca
Post  Posted 30 Nov 2003 3:05 pm    
Reply with quote

Thanks, Carl

So how does the Legrande action compare to the Carter? (My main reason for the thread)

thx

bob
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Richard Sinkler


From:
aka: Rusty Strings -- Missoula, Montana
Post  Posted 1 Dec 2003 3:41 pm    
Reply with quote

Hi Bob. This is off topic, but, why don't you ever bring a guitar to our jams?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Tom Wicks

 

From:
Coombs, British Columbia, Canada
Post  Posted 3 Dec 2003 12:56 am    
Reply with quote

My new D-10 Williams has the best pedal sction I have ever used, Tom playing with a D10 Le Gande a Williams D10 keyless to a Hilton pedal to a RD-3 to an Evans, plaing three and four times a week, I must be in heaven. Tom
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Bob Lawrence


From:
Beaver Bank, Nova Scotia, Canada
Post  Posted 3 Dec 2003 5:12 am    
Reply with quote

After playing my new Franklin for just over a week I sat at my old 1985 Emmons p/p just to remind me what the difference was. All I can say is that the Franklin is like a P/P on Steroids. The Carter test is next...........

------------------
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Jack Strayhorn

 

From:
Winston-Salem, NC
Post  Posted 3 Dec 2003 8:13 pm    
Reply with quote

The LeGrande action is not as easy as some models. This was by design because Buddy always liked a certain amount of resistance. The Zum is somewhat easier with about the same amount of travel. But the Zum's I've played has some roughness in there feel. The Franklin is also very easy and very short travel. This is great for the super fast player but takes away from the soulful note bending. The Mullen is very similiar to an Emmons in resistance but has a slightly mushey feel at the bottom. These are the only guitars I have any experience with, at least enough to give an opinion on. And I would like to express it is my opinion and has been a few years since I've been around any of these guitars. I am sure all companies have made improvements since. I do not find the resistance in my Emmons guitar to be of any issue. I think they are great the way they are and would never consider anything else. Unless of course someone can build one better and most importantly, beat the sound!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Jump to:  

Our Online Catalog
Strings, CDs, instruction,
steel guitars & accessories

www.SteelGuitarShopper.com

Please review our Forum Rules and Policies

Steel Guitar Forum LLC
PO Box 237
Mount Horeb, WI 53572 USA


Click Here to Send a Donation

Email admin@steelguitarforum.com for technical support.


BIAB Styles
Ray Price Shuffles for
Band-in-a-Box

by Jim Baron
HTTP