Tell me about MSAs

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
John Hall
Posts: 52
Joined: 14 Jan 1999 1:01 am
Location: Arlington, TX, USA

Tell me about MSAs

Post by John Hall »

I've been offered an MSA SS 8+5 at a reasonable price (I think). Would anyone like to comment on these guitars. I know they weigh a ton and that's not a concern to a hobby player like me. Any other opinions would be great.


User avatar
Dennis Detweiler
Posts: 3488
Joined: 8 Dec 1998 1:01 am
Location: Solon, Iowa, US

Post by Dennis Detweiler »

Hi John,
They are heavy, but the machining is excellent. Structurally the MSA guitars with birdseye and lacquer were a great guitar with the exception of the notorious "uncommercial" tone. I just finished refurbishing my 1976 U-12 MSA. I replaced the original Super Sustain pickup with a TrueTone wound to 19000. The tone is totally different and a 100% improvement. Very similar to a ShoBud tone. The sustain is nearly continuous, as if the vibration from the guitar is feeding the string again.
Dennis
User avatar
Al Marcus
Posts: 9440
Joined: 12 May 1999 12:01 am
Location: Cedar Springs,MI USA (deceased)
Contact:

Post by Al Marcus »

The MSA SS wood model is one of the last ones Bud Carter designed . It is a lot lighter weight than the older models of MSA's. Has a good Tone too....al Image

------------------
My Website..... www.cmedic.net/~almarcus/

<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Al Marcus on 24 September 2003 at 09:49 PM.]</p></FONT>
Jim Palenscar
Posts: 5857
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Oceanside, Calif, USA
Contact:

Post by Jim Palenscar »

Al is right- the SS MSA's seem to generally have real nice tone. I'm curious- what is the guitar that you are looking at going to sell for?
Reece Anderson
Posts: 2218
Joined: 21 Jun 1999 12:01 am
Location: Keller Texas USA, R.I.P.

Post by Reece Anderson »

John H....If weight is a consideration for you, you will be pleasantly surprised with the MSA double 10 SS. To my knowledge that is the smallest and lightest triple raise and triple lower guitar ever built.

The new MSA Millennium is of course much lighter, but it is ever so slightly larger to make more room between the tunings keys relative from one neck to the other.

I also believe you will be very happy with the sound of the guitar. Compared to other MSA guitars, there were not many SS guitars made.
User avatar
Mike Perlowin
Posts: 15171
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA
Contact:

Post by Mike Perlowin »

MSA's are some of the best steel guitars out there. I have 2 and I love them both. Back in the 70's they were considered the Rolls Royce of the steel guitar.

I think you should buy the guitar, and that will be very happy with ot if you do.

I also think you might want to consider repacing the pickups. There have been some significant improvements in pickups in the last few years and companies like George L and Bill Lawrence are making much better pickups than the original ones that came with your guitar.
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21192
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.

Post by Donny Hinson »

In my own mind, the old "Classics" (not the SS models) have a fullness and richness to their sound that few other guitars have. They do require a <u>good</u> amp and single-coil pickups to get their best sound. (Humbuckers sound somewhat "muddy" on these, with their increased impedance causing most of the problem.)

The "SS" guitars are excellent, with less emphasis on the lows and low mids. Due to their lighter weight and solid-wood body, they will tolerate a humbucking pickup.
Gary Walker
Posts: 1937
Joined: 20 Jul 2000 12:01 am
Location: Morro Bay, CA

Post by Gary Walker »

Having owned a mid 70s D-12 Classic, it was and still would be a wonderfully built and playing steel. They were a bit weighty compared to some today, but they stayed in tune and could handle themselves with the best of them. I missed on a couple of SS D-12s and still may look for one to buy. I wish mine would come home.
User avatar
Darvin Willhoite
Posts: 5715
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Roxton, Tx. USA

Post by Darvin Willhoite »

I have a Classic SS and really like it. The action is extremely smooth and quiet. Mine has a Lawrence 705 on the E9th and a Lawrence 710 on the C6th and sounds great. These were really ahead of their time. Oh, by the way, here's what she looks like.

Image

------------------
Darvin Willhoite
Riva Ridge Recording
User avatar
Les Green
Posts: 555
Joined: 5 Apr 1999 12:01 am
Location: Jefferson City, MO, R.I.P.

Post by Les Green »

I've been playing a D10 classic, 8 & 4, 1973, for all these years. Sounds good, not a dimes worth of trouble with it, except the handle on the case broke. (it is heavy). Very, very seldom breaks strings, stays in tune excellent.........
Les Green
Jeff A. Smith
Posts: 807
Joined: 14 Feb 2001 1:01 am
Location: Angola,Ind. U.S.A.

Post by Jeff A. Smith »

If you're happy with the sound, I'd pick it up. The SS's are more sought after than most other MSA's.

Changing the pickup will make a dramatic difference.
User avatar
Eric West
Posts: 5747
Joined: 25 Apr 2002 12:01 am
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA, R.I.P.
Contact:

Post by Eric West »

Plug it in, turn it UP, and....

Play it like you STOLE it..

Don't be throwing away that pickup . Danny Shields might have wound it.

Image

EJL<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Eric West on 25 September 2003 at 09:03 PM.]</p></FONT>
Gary Walker
Posts: 1937
Joined: 20 Jul 2000 12:01 am
Location: Morro Bay, CA

Post by Gary Walker »

Reece informed me that the so-called SS D-12s I thought of buying were not the Super Sustain but were infered to make it sound more inviting. I obviously hadn't seen them and they don't exist, thanks Reece, Gary.
User avatar
Ulf Edlund
Posts: 965
Joined: 6 Mar 2003 1:01 am

Post by Ulf Edlund »

The SS stands for "super small" so it doesn't weigh a ton. The "Super Sustain" refers to the original pickups.
I own a Classic SS just like the one pictured on Darvin W's post above exept it's 8+4. It plays well, stays in tune and sounds good with E-66 pickups, but i have a pair of TrueTones on order 'cause i'm a sucker for the response and clearity of single coils. The only negative thing about it is the tuning pegs on string 10 on E9 and string one on C6 which is so close to each other that they can "collide".
However, all things concidered it's a fine guitar and i recommend it.

Uffe
User avatar
Kenny Davis
Posts: 1370
Joined: 10 Apr 1999 12:01 am
Location: Great State of Oklahoma

Post by Kenny Davis »

I have always had a Sho~Bud, but a couple of years ago, I got a Classic SS. It's a lot lighter, and more compact than what I've always played. Pedal action is great, and it stays in tune. It has the original Super Sustain pickups, and after a little amp tweaking, it sounds a lot like my Pro II. If it's as nice as mine, anything under $2K would be a bargain.
User avatar
Bob Blair
Posts: 2623
Joined: 15 Jul 1999 12:01 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Post by Bob Blair »

I also had one just like Darvin's - same colour. It was a good guitar. Had Lawrence 705's in it, and it had a great E-9th sound - the low end on the C'6th was not as good as I would have hoped. I sold it awhile after buying an EMCI, and after deciding that it was a shame to have it sitting around in its case not getting played. I have subsequently regretted selling it - mostly every time Darvin posts that picture of his. But then again, how many steels does a guy need......<FONT SIZE=1 COLOR="#8e236b"><p align=CENTER>[This message was edited by Bob Blair on 26 September 2003 at 07:21 PM.]</p></FONT>
Post Reply