Nothing

Paul Graupp · Post by **Paul Graupp** » 4 Oct 2013 12:55 pm

Or could it be that the NOSE have (...has...) it ??

Post by **b0b** » 4 Oct 2013 2:51 pm

Eye nose nothing.

Scott Shipley · Post by **Scott Shipley** » 7 Oct 2013 11:43 am

Sorry, thought there was something going on here.

Paul Graupp · Post by **Paul Graupp** » 7 Oct 2013 12:36 pm

It's just NOTHING, Scott !

$:\$

Greely Baggett · Post by **Greely Baggett** » 16 Oct 2013 6:01 pm

I've never agreed to anything, but this time I must agree!

Don Kona Woods · Post by **Don Kona Woods** » 16 Oct 2013 10:33 pm

From the movie "NOTHING" comes the definition of nothing - It is a featureless and empty white void.

I learned something that I did not know before in that the void is white. But what kind of white is it?

Roy Heap · Post by **Roy Heap** » 17 Oct 2013 12:15 am

It's NOTHING but white Don.

Alan Brookes · Post by **Alan Brookes** » 17 Oct 2013 9:13 am

Nothing isn't white. White is caused by the reflection of light. Since light is not nothing, neither can white be. The complete absence of light is black. For istance, if you turn off a computer monitor it goes black, not white. The white you see on modern monitors needs a constant voltage to maintain it. Those of us who used computers in the early days are familiar with the early monitors on which words were always green or yellow on a black background. In fact, when the white background was introduced I found it a lot too glaring. Nowadays we take it for granted. I'm typing on a white background now. But really, the only reason computer programs use white as a background for words is that we're used to seeing printed books and papers, and no-one writes on black paper. In fact it would be very difficult to write on black paper, but that would have nothing to do with the topic. $:\$

Paul Graupp · Post by **Paul Graupp** » 17 Oct 2013 3:13 pm

I don't know if this is correct or just another NOTHING...but if red were the lowest frequency in the color spectrum and orange a bit higher, their radius in the visual sighting of a rainbow would be the longest and the next to the longest and so on and so forth through the remaining colors.

Alan Brookes · Post by **Alan Brookes** » 17 Oct 2013 3:52 pm

Paul Graupp wrote:I don't know if this is correct or just another NOTHING...but if red were the lowest frequency in the color spectrum and orange a bit higher, their radius in the visual sighting of a rainbow would be the longest and the next to the longest and so on and so forth through the remaining colors.

You're right on three counts:-
[1] You don't know if it's correct.

[2] It actually is correct.

[3] It's just another "nothing".

Well done, three out of three,

and completely irrelevant to the discussion of "nothing",

yet containing the word "nothing". $:\$

It's a tautological fact that any subject that has nothing to do with "nothing", automatically has relevance to "nothing" in that it has nothing to do with the subject. $:\$ $:\$ $:\$ $:\$

Paul Graupp · Post by **Paul Graupp** » 17 Oct 2013 4:17 pm

Run that by me one more time TAUTOLOGICAL

Is that a word Tonto would use on the Lone Ranger ?

Don Kona Woods · Post by **Don Kona Woods** » 17 Oct 2013 10:37 pm

Alan responds by saying

The complete absence of light is black.

Could this mean that the absence of light is NOTHING so therefore black is NOTHING?

Roy Heap · Post by **Roy Heap** » 17 Oct 2013 11:24 pm

Blimey ,NOTHING makes sense here, I think I will just go and sit in the garden and do NOTHING.

Scott Duckworth · Post by **Scott Duckworth** » 18 Oct 2013 3:43 am

I'm going back to bed, all this NOTHING has made me tired... and it's only 7:45AM...

Alan Brookes · Post by **Alan Brookes** » 18 Oct 2013 8:55 am

Monday was the anniversary of the Battle of Hastings, fought 14th October, 1066.

Roy Heap · Post by **Roy Heap** » 18 Oct 2013 9:59 am

Alan,
That means NOTHING to me I wasn't there.

Alan Brookes · Post by **Alan Brookes** » 18 Oct 2013 2:22 pm

Exactly. It's completely off-topic, which means that it has nothing to do with the topic, which means that it's on-topic.

$:\$ $:\$

Paul Graupp · Post by **Paul Graupp** » 19 Oct 2013 6:46 am

Makes TAUTOLOGIC sense to me whatever that means...

Post by **b0b** » 19 Oct 2013 9:09 am

Literally, and geologically.

Scott Duckworth · Post by **Scott Duckworth** » 19 Oct 2013 9:31 am

This the thread you go to when you have NOTHING else to do...

Alan Brookes · Post by **Alan Brookes** » 19 Oct 2013 10:11 am

It's also the thread you go to when you do have other things to do but you're too lazy to do them.
http://bb.steelguitarforum.com/viewtopi ... &start=325
Those people should register for my Procrastination Workshop.

Scott Duckworth · Post by **Scott Duckworth** » 19 Oct 2013 11:47 am

Alan, you're to blame... now we are at 125 pages of NOTHING!

Ken Campbell · Post by **Ken Campbell** » 19 Oct 2013 12:51 pm

Nothin'

Post by **b0b** » 19 Oct 2013 1:41 pm

Me neither, er, too.

Alan Brookes · Post by **Alan Brookes** » 19 Oct 2013 4:57 pm

Scott Duckworth wrote:Alan, you're to blame... now we are at 125 pages of NOTHING!

I wasn't the originator of this thread. Thst was Sir Bob the Knight. Like you, I just participate. If there's anyone to blame for the 125 pages it's everyone who has ever participated in it. If Bobby Lee doesn't mind the space it takes up on his hard disk, it does at least provide several hours of reading entertainment for anyone wishing to go through the whole thing.

Scott, maybe you should make an audio recording, reading it all out, and then send it to Librivox.

The Steel Guitar Forum

Nothing

Nothing

I got