Author |
Topic: Flipping the lid on D9 |
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 21 Nov 2012 12:22 pm
|
|
Intrigued by this speedy tune (pun intended) I was looking if one of my guitars would accomodate this tuning, without the need to restring. I thought somebody might be interested how this worked out.
Unfortunately the F#9 tuning variant Mike Neer used in his superb video with the high pitched string on top was not compatible with anything I have yet.
G# E C# A# G# E C# A# - F#9 tuning Mike Neer
(high to low)
However, Mike somewhere mentioned that it can be played in D9 tuning. This is a D9 variant that is called "drop string C6" in John Ely´s list of tunings:
E C A F# E C A F# - Drop string C6 tuning (D9)
this is four halftone steps down from F#9.
The closest tuning I have on a 8 string guitar is B11 (J. Byrd):
E C# A F# D# C# A B - B11 (J. Byrd
0 -1 0 0 +1 -1 0 -1*
below are the halftone steps needed to change for D9 (the formatting does not work well). The string gauges can accomodate halftone changes like that. Note that the bottom string is not tuned to F#, being too much difference. It is tuned to an sub-octave A instead.
The seven string approach has the advantage that you don´t have to repeat the double string grip Mike mentions for the 6 string version.
I treated the video with some program to lower it to D9 pitch, which makes it much, much easier to work with.
This works exceptionally well, except Mike´s voice is lowered too, and this makes you sound, ahem, very masculine, Mike.
have fun,
-helmut _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
Jeff Mead
From: London, England
|
Posted 21 Nov 2012 12:57 pm
|
|
I have been experimenting a bit with the D9 tuning too.
Luckily, my main tuning is A6 (E C# A F# E C# A F#) so I didn't need to do much retuning. |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 29 Nov 2012 12:16 pm
|
|
I played with the tuning for a while, flipping my lid extensively
Although the song comes out great, this tuning does not make much sense to me otherwise - very restriced.
I wonder if Speedy did the comping you can hear on the youtube video during the guitar solo in the same tuning or on another neck.
Would anybody know? As I said, I am not familiar with this tuning and its possibilities are hard to imagine for me.
-helmut _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
Jeff Mead
From: London, England
|
Posted 29 Nov 2012 12:42 pm
|
|
Yes, I came to the same conclusion as you and would probably only use this tuning for the odd solo and with another neck for the main part of the song.
Speedy, of course was using a pedal steel (usually with 3 necks) from about 1948 so wouldn't have had this problem as he could slip in and out of this tuning at will.
The F#9 - 8 string tuning which is sometimes listed for him (G# E C# A# G# E D B)would have been used with a pedal to raise the A# to a B which would then give the far more common E13 tuning. |
|
|
|
Jerome Hawkes
From: Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA
|
Posted 29 Nov 2012 1:00 pm
|
|
i recall Buddy Emmons saying his Bigsby came with that tuning as he was a big Speedy fan as a teenager. but he said it never proved all that practical for him and he soon ditched it.
i havent messed with it myself, but enjoyed Mikes transcription.
i guess you have to look at it historically - back then, everyone was looking for a unique signature sound and Speedy certainly found it. _________________ '65 Sho-Bud D-10 Permanent • '54 Fender Dual-8 • Clinesmith T-8 • '38 Ric Bakelite • '92 Emmons D-10 Legrande II |
|
|
|
Mike Neer
From: NJ
|
Posted 29 Nov 2012 1:35 pm
|
|
Skiddle-Dee-Boo and many other great Speedy tunes use this tuning. Think of it as a specialty tuning: if you want to play one of these tunes and your tuning is C6 or E6 with the 3rd on top, simply retune the 2 strings. That's how I approach and that's how many players do as well. _________________ Links to streaming music, websites, YouTube: Links |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 30 Nov 2012 1:14 am
|
|
Thanks for your opinions guys. Sometimes I think I should have trusted my initial impulse in the first place
Yes you can twist it whichever way you want - you´re gonna need more necks or pedals (or both) to the point of becoming impractical.
Quote: |
1. Flip your lid
(...) 'flip your lid' is a threat, or another way of saying 'I'm going to kick your butt'. (...)
Also can be used as a term for boys jacking off. Refers to 'flipping' or moving the foreskin to get to the glans. |
from http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Flip%20your%20lid
-helmut _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|
Mike Neer
From: NJ
|
Posted 30 Nov 2012 8:23 am
|
|
That Flippin' The Lid video was the first time I ever attempted to make any kind of instructional video. I had an old Super 8 camera and the quality is crap. The Slippery Elm one is there, too. Both suffer from drop-outs and general poor quality--not long after, I purchased 3 digital cameras.
The Speedy tune Wild and Woolly West is extremely fun (and a little difficult) to play--it has a similar vibe to Flippin' The Lid, but uses E9 tuning for the head and F#9 for the solo, so it's played on 2 necks.
Here's my version: http://soundcloud.com/ionahoopii/wildandwoollywest
I made a lesson for that one, but not too many have been inclined to go for it. _________________ Links to streaming music, websites, YouTube: Links |
|
|
|
Andy Henriksen
From: Michigan, USA
|
Posted 30 Nov 2012 1:00 pm
|
|
Mike Neer wrote: |
The Speedy tune Wild and Woolly West is extremely fun (and a little difficult) to play. |
A little difficult, eh?
Amazing, Mike! |
|
|
|
Helmut Gragger
From: Austria
|
Posted 1 Dec 2012 2:41 am
|
|
Mike Neer wrote: |
(...) I had an old Super 8 camera and the quality is crap. (...) |
Irrelevant. The video helps one to understand the piece in no time. This is a great piece and a great job you did man.
I play it much slower though, #1 because you gotta start slow when you train a piece that heavily relies on fast picking. #2 after a while I actually prefer the slower pace because that forces you into a different feeling which works nicely.
Once I have mastered the piece I will upload it. On the original recording, Speedy went away Doo-Wahing (or whatever this is called these days) with the volume knob. I failed catastrophically on this , meaning too much distraction. Also, I have no intentions to get into that. However, those guys probably wouldn´t have way back then if they had what we have today - effect pedals, letting alone the fact that it would be rather cumbersome on some setups.
As I mentioned elsewhere here, I have worked out a patch for my effects processor that does exaclty that. Although it does technically not exactly the same, it sounds quite convincing. This also means very litte extra effort and distraction.
I will upload that here later FYI.
The piece sounds great with some boo-wahing.
have fun,
-helmut _________________ feel at home at: http://me.aquataur.guru |
|
|
|