heavier strings on a converted acoustic lap = danger?

Lap steels, resonators, multi-neck consoles and acoustic steel guitars

Moderator: Brad Bechtel

Post Reply
Adam Gejdos
Posts: 19
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 9:39 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

heavier strings on a converted acoustic lap = danger?

Post by Adam Gejdos »

Hello,
I decided to put some heavier strings on an old Samick acoustic that I'd converted to lap (DADF#AD). I've been using D'Addario EJ16s for a year or so but needed heavier melody strings. I put my squareneck stings on (EJ42s) and they sound really good. They're 56,45,35,28,18,16. I assume they're fine (did internet research) but figured I'd check with the experts. Anyone had issues with this heavier gauge (ie pulling on the bridge)? Anyone prefer a different set?
Cheers, Adam
User avatar
Steve Green
Posts: 837
Joined: 11 Oct 2010 11:28 am
Location: Gulfport, MS, USA
Contact:

Post by Steve Green »

FWIW, I've got a round neck resonator that I bought a riser nut for and wanted to convert to "dobro style". I went to the local music store to buy some .016 gauge dobro strings, and the guy who worked there said I shouldn't go any heavier than .013's, because the round neck wasn't made for that much tension. I went with the .013's and haven't had any problems. I've since gotten a square neck, and use .016's on it.
User avatar
Erv Niehaus
Posts: 26797
Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
Location: Litchfield, MN, USA

Post by Erv Niehaus »

I would also vote in favor of the lighter strings.
When you put a nut riser on a round neck guitar, you put greater leverage on the neck and run the risk of damaging it.
User avatar
Michael Maddex
Posts: 1141
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Northern New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Post by Michael Maddex »

FWIW, I have had .016 - .056 strings (both the D'Addario bronze and the Martin nickel) on a Rogue roundneck reso with an extension nut for years with no problem. It is tuned Spanish: (L2H) D G D G B D. The strings might be a little heavy for tuning Dobro: (L2H) G B D G B D. YMMV.
"For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert." -- Arthur C. Clarke
Adam Gejdos
Posts: 19
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 9:39 am
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Post by Adam Gejdos »

Thanks guys. Yeah, I think I'll go a tad lighter, just to be safe. It's actually my wife's old acoustic that she "lent" me. My marriage is more important than slightly improved tone!
User avatar
Erv Niehaus
Posts: 26797
Joined: 10 Aug 2001 12:01 am
Location: Litchfield, MN, USA

Post by Erv Niehaus »

You sure wouldn't want to snap the neck on that baby! :whoa:
Bill Hatcher
Posts: 7252
Joined: 6 Nov 1998 1:01 am
Location: Atlanta Ga. USA

Post by Bill Hatcher »

you can use the heavy strings, just dont leave the guitar up to pitch when not being played. i have repaired too many acoustics with pulled up bridges and dovetail joint problems.

when you are finished playing just turn the tuners down a couple of turns and release a little string tension. this takes enough pressure off the top to never have a problem. i do this with all my acoustic intruments when in the case. unloads the top just a little.
Hans Henrik Rasmussen
Posts: 99
Joined: 24 Jul 2007 7:48 pm
Location: Denmark, Copenhagen

Post by Hans Henrik Rasmussen »

Hi Adam,

I'm using 017-.020-.026-.035-.045-.056 for Open D on my Gibson FJN. That is a short scale guitar, though, but I've used 016-.019-.026-.035-.045-.056 for Open D on a 25.5 scale without problems.

I even have an old Samick (greg bennett D7, I think) with an extension nut and a set of D'addario EJ17 (.013-.056) on it. I've used that for years, no problems what so ever.

Try toying with something like this: http://www.mcdonaldstrings.com/stringxxiii.html Open D tuning with heavier 1st and 2nd strings actually ends up putting less tension on your guitar than lighter strings in standard tuning.

Best,
Hans
Post Reply