Emmons Sticker
Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn
- Jerry Hayes
- Posts: 7489
- Joined: 3 Mar 1999 1:01 am
- Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
I went from an old ShoBud S-12 Uni to a BMI Uni about 20 years ago and the first thing I did was take the BMI decal off and put on an Emmons logo which I kept on for a couple of years. As I played it more and more I kept realizing how much better engineered it was than my old 'bud and how much better it sounded so I got another BMI logo and put it back on the guitar and it'll remain there forever. I love BMI guitars and believe they'll compete with anything on the market.
As far as the Carter sticker, I'd leave it on, those folks went to a lot of time and effort to build your guitar so give 'em credit......JH in Va.
As far as the Carter sticker, I'd leave it on, those folks went to a lot of time and effort to build your guitar so give 'em credit......JH in Va.
Don't matter who's in Austin (or anywhere else) Ralph Mooney is still the king!!!
- Bill Terry
- Posts: 2786
- Joined: 29 Apr 1999 12:01 am
- Location: Bastrop, TX
Funny, I've been playing Carters for several years now, and I've never had anybody do that.. you need a new place to play.Often when they see my carter sticker on my sd 10 they start telling me tiresome Jimmy Carter jokes.
That said, I never liked the look of the decals, kinda ugly, and you couldn't read them from very far away anyway, so I bought a couple of the newer 'bubble' logos from Al Brisco. Way cooler...
Lost Pines Studio
"I'm nuts about bolts"
"I'm nuts about bolts"
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: 20 May 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Northern New Mexico
- Walter Bowden
- Posts: 473
- Joined: 26 Mar 2009 1:58 pm
- Location: Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
- Jeremy Craft
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 29 Oct 2010 9:24 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Don't be a wanna-be.
When you own an instrument, it is your prerogative to do what you want to it to make it your own. Don't like the fretboard? Chuck it at put on one you like. Hate the logo? Remove it--if the manufacturer really wanted it to stay put, he wouldn't use a decal, he'd inlay it. If you think you might resell it, don't do so much to it; odds are, nobody else will want it just the way you like it.
That said, adding a different manufacturer's logo to it sends a message that although you have Brand X, you think that Brand Y is better and you wish you had one, but you're too broke to have a real one.
Putting the logo of some company that has nothing to do with PSGs works though. That's funny.
That said, adding a different manufacturer's logo to it sends a message that although you have Brand X, you think that Brand Y is better and you wish you had one, but you're too broke to have a real one.
Putting the logo of some company that has nothing to do with PSGs works though. That's funny.
- Curt Langston
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 3 Apr 2000 12:01 am
-
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Spicewood TX 78669
- Contact:
Not to get into hyperbole, but there's another issue involved if, say, an Emmons logo was put on a non-Emmons guitar: a threatening lawyers' cease-and-desist letter.
The Emmons logo is trademarked (I assume). Putting that logo on a non-Emmons guitar could be considered, legally, a "dilution of trademark" and damaging to the company.
C.F. Martin, Gibson, and Fender are all VERY protective of their logos, as well they should be. There have been lawsuits over this issue.
John F. and I had a related discussion years ago about a fellow he knew of who took the Carter logo off his guitar because he didn't care for the esthetic look of the decal. John was pissed off about it, understandably. He agreed the fellow had the legal right to do it, but he said "I'll never sell HIM another guitar."
I suggested to John, more-than-half-jokingly, that the guy may have voided the warranty. John kind of liked that idea.
The Emmons logo is trademarked (I assume). Putting that logo on a non-Emmons guitar could be considered, legally, a "dilution of trademark" and damaging to the company.
C.F. Martin, Gibson, and Fender are all VERY protective of their logos, as well they should be. There have been lawsuits over this issue.
John F. and I had a related discussion years ago about a fellow he knew of who took the Carter logo off his guitar because he didn't care for the esthetic look of the decal. John was pissed off about it, understandably. He agreed the fellow had the legal right to do it, but he said "I'll never sell HIM another guitar."
I suggested to John, more-than-half-jokingly, that the guy may have voided the warranty. John kind of liked that idea.
My rig: Infinity and Telonics.
Son, we live in a world with walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with steel guitars. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg?
Son, we live in a world with walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with steel guitars. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg?
- Dave Mudgett
- Moderator
- Posts: 9648
- Joined: 16 Jul 2004 12:01 am
- Location: Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee
Not a new idea:
I believe that yellow steel is a Carter, I got a pretty close look at it when I saw him a couple of years ago, and this has been discussed here a number of times. A rose by any other name - Carter is a really fine guitar no matter whose label is on it. Now perhaps there were contractual issues involved here, I don't know the whys and wherefores. But outside the presence of an endorsement deal, I think the fact that one is playing a particular guitar speaks volumes about what one thinks about it.
I also think this thread shows something else - if you're gonna do something like this, it may be a good idea to just do it and not tell anybody about it. It seems to be just about impossible to avoid offending people with this kind of stuff.
I believe that yellow steel is a Carter, I got a pretty close look at it when I saw him a couple of years ago, and this has been discussed here a number of times. A rose by any other name - Carter is a really fine guitar no matter whose label is on it. Now perhaps there were contractual issues involved here, I don't know the whys and wherefores. But outside the presence of an endorsement deal, I think the fact that one is playing a particular guitar speaks volumes about what one thinks about it.
I also think this thread shows something else - if you're gonna do something like this, it may be a good idea to just do it and not tell anybody about it. It seems to be just about impossible to avoid offending people with this kind of stuff.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: 14 Dec 2009 5:54 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
I can understand not liking the cheesy vinyl sticker. I don't like mine either altho I LOVE the guitar. Just take it off. To put another maker's decal on it is not right.
Fender decals are available for a dime a dozen on ebay. If you put one one a $89 Chinese crap guitar what does that say about you.
If you don't like the decal (Which I understand and agree with)..just take it off and leave the guitar nameless.
Fender decals are available for a dime a dozen on ebay. If you put one one a $89 Chinese crap guitar what does that say about you.
If you don't like the decal (Which I understand and agree with)..just take it off and leave the guitar nameless.
Bill
- John Swain
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 12 Feb 2000 1:01 am
- Location: Newberry,SC
- Curt Langston
- Posts: 2907
- Joined: 3 Apr 2000 12:01 am
-
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
- Location: Spicewood TX 78669
- Contact:
Curt Langston wrote:I wouldn't worry about that at all.The Emmons logo is trademarked (I assume). Putting that logo on a non-Emmons guitar could be considered, legally, a "dilution of trademark" and damaging to the company.
I think the damage and "dilution" has already been done.
And of course, there are those here who simply wait for any mention of the Emmons Company to disparage them by bringing up old "news."
One of the reasons why some of the folks who inhabit this place has made a few of these forum threads really sucky lately, and why I don't come around much anymore.
Just MHO. Keep on with your hard-ons, if it makes you happy. Include me "out" of you non-stop bitch-fest.
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: 10 Feb 2004 1:01 am
- Cliff Kane
- Posts: 1932
- Joined: 10 Dec 1999 1:01 am
- Location: the late great golden state
- Contact:
- Alan Brookes
- Posts: 13218
- Joined: 29 Mar 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Brummy living in Southern California
-
- Posts: 6870
- Joined: 20 Apr 2002 12:01 am
- Location: Over there
Don't know that it could be put any better. Anybody that knows steel guitars would be able to spot the difference from 50 feet away. And if they DON'T know anything about steel guitar, then what difference does it make.Mike Perlowin wrote:I agree with Bob Hoffnar. If you are happy with the guitar, you should leave the logo in place so people can see what you're playing. If some people diss you for playing a Carter because of their feelings about our former president, that just shows how stupid and foolish they are. And if you are ashamed to be playing a Carter, then play something else.
-
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: 17 May 2001 12:01 am
- Location: Branchville, NJ, USA * R.I.P.
Hello Kitty
I have a "Hello Kitty" Emblem that I got on the Web. I am just waiting for the right instrument or amp to put it on.
- Per Berner
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: 10 Aug 2004 12:01 am
- Location: Skövde, Sweden
- Contact:
The main reasons why people wish to replace the logo decals on their steels are a) putting a plastic decal logo on a 3-5000 dollar instrument is tasteless beyond belief (as are some screen printed fretboards - and remember the nasty decal "bindings" on MSA's back in the eighties), and b) steel guitar manufacturers have, with a few exceptions, hideous logotypes!
They even see the need to include the words "Steel Guitars" on the front... If the builder takes pride in his work, would it hurt to add a metal or inlaid logo, designed by a competent pro? I'd gladly pay 10 or 20 bucks extra for that. Or more, if needed.
The good logotype exceptions (among the bigger brands being manufactured today) are, in my not even remotely humble opinion: Emmons, Excel, Zumsteel, full stop. Then there are a few half-decent ones, but the majority do nothing to enhance the look and value of the instruments they are displayed on.
So no big wonder they are being removed and replaced!
They even see the need to include the words "Steel Guitars" on the front... If the builder takes pride in his work, would it hurt to add a metal or inlaid logo, designed by a competent pro? I'd gladly pay 10 or 20 bucks extra for that. Or more, if needed.
The good logotype exceptions (among the bigger brands being manufactured today) are, in my not even remotely humble opinion: Emmons, Excel, Zumsteel, full stop. Then there are a few half-decent ones, but the majority do nothing to enhance the look and value of the instruments they are displayed on.
So no big wonder they are being removed and replaced!
Last edited by Per Berner on 17 Dec 2010 7:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Adair Torres
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 30 Sep 2008 12:48 pm
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Contact:
- Adair Torres
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 30 Sep 2008 12:48 pm
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Contact:
- Alan Brookes
- Posts: 13218
- Joined: 29 Mar 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Brummy living in Southern California
Luthiers who build acoustic instruments NEVER put a logo on the outside of a guitar. It's sufficient to put a tactful sticker on the inside. The only permissable deviation from that is when builders of acoustic steel-strung guitars often put a name on the headstock. When I build steel guitars I put a maker's label on the underneath. When I build acoustic instruments I put a maker's label inside. Discretion is a mark of artistry.
- Adair Torres
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 30 Sep 2008 12:48 pm
- Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Contact:
- Ward Skinner
- Posts: 257
- Joined: 13 Feb 2006 1:01 am
- Location: Mission, TX * R.I.P.
Earlier I posted a pic of a friend's Excel and got some positive feedback, and for a few hours even I thought I was cool. But I'm not. I have a Derby and Carter and the logos are there. I've seen the comments that Carter logos are ugly or look like they belong on a water heater, that's funny. And the Derby logo comes up now and again. But really I could care less.
One of the guys I play with has a young grandson named Carter, so they love the name, that's the only comment I've ever gotten on Carter. A northern steeler last year looked at my Derby and told me he had never heard of that brand. Hey, at least he could see the 'Big D'.
This is my Carter with automotive finish, what would you call this color?
One of the guys I play with has a young grandson named Carter, so they love the name, that's the only comment I've ever gotten on Carter. A northern steeler last year looked at my Derby and told me he had never heard of that brand. Hey, at least he could see the 'Big D'.
This is my Carter with automotive finish, what would you call this color?
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: 10 Feb 2004 1:01 am