Song Stylists Lacking Today

Musical topics not directly related to steel guitar

Moderators: Dave Mudgett, Janice Brooks

User avatar
John P. Phillips
Posts: 2532
Joined: 20 Oct 2000 12:01 am
Location: Folkston, Ga. U.S.A., R.I.P.
Contact:

Song Stylists Lacking Today

Post by John P. Phillips »

Watched an interview on the tube this morning featuring Tanya Tucker and one of her comments raised a question in my mind. She said that there were very few song stylists these days.Not like singers of the past who were good stylists as well as good singers. It got me to thinking that this is something I haven't seen discussed here on the forum. And I think she's right ! It seems to be strangely missing today. That may be a contributing factor in the songs of today not sticking in our memory as well as the classic songs do. Am I nitpicking here or does this seem like a valid observation ? What is your take on this question. How do you feel about stylists in todays music ? Would it help today's artists. Does all the hype like fancy light shows, smoke bombs, ragged dress and all the rest just bury the music so far in the background that it is overlooked in today's "Money Market"?
What's your opinion ?
User avatar
Earnest Bovine
Posts: 8318
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA USA

Post by Earnest Bovine »

You could say that a "stylist" is someone who can't do it any other way, even if he tried; in other words a performer of limited ability. You could define "ethnic" in a similar way. If you are capable of doing it any differently, then you are a phony and not truly ethnic.
User avatar
Barry Blackwood
Posts: 7352
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 12:01 am

Post by Barry Blackwood »

John, I agree, and I don't think you're nitpicking. The music business keeps devolving - case in point - the return of Garth Brooks. :\
User avatar
Jeff Evans
Posts: 1618
Joined: 4 Apr 1999 1:01 am
Location: Cowtown and The Bill Cox Outfit
Contact:

Shopping for ragged dresses

Post by Jeff Evans »

... ragged dress ...
I make all my own . . . all in one colour; all in one size.
Image

On the crux of the topic, does overstatement and hyper-emoting constitute a style?

... devolving - case in point - the return of Garth Brooks.
Bare: If GB offers you 100Gs to sit through "Shamus" for four months, what will your answer be?
User avatar
Rick Campbell
Posts: 4283
Joined: 8 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Sneedville, TN, USA

Post by Rick Campbell »

I agree 100%. I've come to believe that there is basically two styles in today's country music: Male and Female. Like them or not: Buck, Willie, Johnny Cash, Ernie Ashworth, Paycheck, Loretta, Connie, Patsy, Conway, Del, Merle, etc... had very distinct styles. I don't hear that in today's singers. I have noticed that almost every new country song has a 6 minor in it. I guess maybe that's some kind of new protocol. :)


:)
User avatar
Jim Cohen
Posts: 21749
Joined: 18 Nov 1999 1:01 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Post by Jim Cohen »

Once again I find myself rising to the bait offered by my erudite friend, Earnest Bovine (who, I'm sure, just says stuff to get a rise outta people). I don't think that a stylist is necessarily one who can not, if he/she wanted to, perform in any other manner than the one you've heard them use on recordings. Some are very accomplished in a variety of styles of delivery, but they are also savvy enough, in a marketing sense, to know that differentiation in the marketplace is (or at least used to be!) important for commercial success.

Earnest, you're still a curmudgeon ('not that there's anything wrong with that'). ;)
Donny Hinson
Posts: 21192
Joined: 16 Feb 1999 1:01 am
Location: Glen Burnie, Md. U.S.A.

Post by Donny Hinson »

I honestly can't believe that all the southern/country accents I hear these days are real. I've been listening to country music for over a half-century, and believe me, there weren't even this many "drawls and "y'alls" back in the days of Kitty, Hank, Loretta, and Webb. :lol:
User avatar
Earnest Bovine
Posts: 8318
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Los Angeles CA USA

Post by Earnest Bovine »

Jim Cohen wrote:... rising to the bait offered by my erudite friend, Earnest Bovine .. Some [stylists] are very accomplished in a variety of styles of delivery
I didn't mean to bait you (not this time). In my experience "stylist" is a euphemism. Is it not a compliment.
User avatar
Marc Friedland
Posts: 1042
Joined: 26 Jan 1999 1:01 am
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Contact:

Post by Marc Friedland »

I can appreciate J C’s point of view, but feel I’m closer to E B’s line of thinking though I admit there may be exceptions to the rule.
Some times a singer doesn’t have the most enjoyable voice to listen to and/or perhaps he/she doesn’t have the best control over their intonation, but may have a very interesting delivery or engaging personality that comes through when they sing that makes a listener say yes, I enjoy listening to them sing, they’re entertaining.
I would typically call this person a stylist as compared to a singer or vocalist. Now that I think about it, this could also apply to musicians playing instruments, not just singers. Though I apply a definition to differentiate between a singer and a stylist or an instrumentalist and a stylist, it’s not my intention to assign a value judgment, saying one type of entertainer is more valuable than another.
Marc
User avatar
Rick Campbell
Posts: 4283
Joined: 8 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Sneedville, TN, USA

Post by Rick Campbell »

Barry Blackwood wrote:John, I agree, and I don't think you're nitpicking. The music business keeps devolving - case in point - the return of Garth Brooks. :\
I think Garth is already putting a band together with twin fiddles and steel guitar. He's going to come out all traditional country style with a lot of shuffles and ballads. Sort of a new Ray Price, Johnny Bush, Mel Tillis sound....... and that's when I woke up. :)
User avatar
Dave Mudgett
Moderator
Posts: 9648
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 12:01 am
Location: Central Pennsylvania and Gallatin, Tennessee

Post by Dave Mudgett »

I'm with Jim Cohen on this. A stylist is not necessarily limited, and a versatile and technically excellent singer is not necessarily 'phony' if he or she decides to focus on one style and add their stylistic thing to it. My favorite example is Screamin' Jay Hawkins - he had an really fine operatic voice with excellent range and control, but generally preferred to stick to his extremely stylistic rock and roll schtick.

Sinatra and Pavarotti were certainly singers of a particular style - I think it would have been tough for either to convincingly sing in many styles like hillbilly or gutbucket blues. But as far as being limited - let me just say that I wouldn't mind having that kind of vocal 'limitation'.

This thread is a good example of how far people are apart on musical issues - one group laments the lack of stylists, and another argues that the term stylist is a non-complimentary euphemism.

I personally also lament the lack of stylistic strength in modern singing. To me, technical singing excellence and stylistic tendencies are orthogonal to each other. One can be technically excellent and stylistic, one or the other, or neither. The only one I don't care for is neither.

My opinions, of course.
User avatar
Barry Blackwood
Posts: 7352
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 12:01 am

Post by Barry Blackwood »

If GB offers you 100Gs to sit through "Shamus" for four months, what will your answer be?
Jeff, I don't know what "Shamus" is, but for that kind of green, I'd most likely say yes anyway.

Also, well said, Mark F.
User avatar
Rick Campbell
Posts: 4283
Joined: 8 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Sneedville, TN, USA

Post by Rick Campbell »

Barry Blackwood wrote:
If GB offers you 100Gs to sit through "Shamus" for four months, what will your answer be?
Jeff, I don't know what "Shamus" is, but for that kind of green, I'd most likely say yes anyway.

Also, well said, Mark F.
I think "Shamus" is that cloth you use to wash your car. I saw it on TV. Anyway, the 100Gs sounds attractive, but would we be required to stay sober?
User avatar
Ken Lang
Posts: 4708
Joined: 8 Jul 1999 12:01 am
Location: Simi Valley, Ca

Post by Ken Lang »

I sure there are people we could call stylists, but was Johnny Cash called a stylist, or any of the early ones? I think then is was called the sound. He had a unique sound.
For me, that's the crux of it. All the singers must fit within the confines of the mold.
Let's bring back the different kind of country voices and let them rise or fall by our vote, not the record companys.
heavily medicated for your safety
Jody Sanders
Posts: 7055
Joined: 12 Apr 2000 12:01 am
Location: Magnolia,Texas, R.I.P.
Contact:

Post by Jody Sanders »

Hang in there Rick. Jody.
User avatar
Chris LeDrew
Posts: 6404
Joined: 27 May 2005 12:01 am
Location: Canada

Re: Shopping for ragged dresses

Post by Chris LeDrew »

Jeff Evans wrote: On the crux of the topic, does overstatement and hyper-emoting constitute a style?
Yes.....it's called Conway Twitty:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67GSo3Mx ... re=related
Last edited by Chris LeDrew on 17 Oct 2009 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jackson Steel Guitars
Web: www.chrisledrew.com
User avatar
Chris LeDrew
Posts: 6404
Joined: 27 May 2005 12:01 am
Location: Canada

Post by Chris LeDrew »

Rick Campbell wrote: I have noticed that almost every new country song has a 6 minor in it. I guess maybe that's some kind of new protocol. :)
Naaa......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxQbvSjQy9A


Nothing changes but our perception.
Jackson Steel Guitars
Web: www.chrisledrew.com
User avatar
Walter Stettner
Posts: 5744
Joined: 21 Nov 2003 1:01 am
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Post by Walter Stettner »

Ask yourself a simple question: How many of yesterday's country stars with unique voices would get a chance to start a career these days?

Kitty Wells, Roy Acuff, Bill Anderson, Skeeter Davis, Hank Snow, ET, Dolly Parton, Willie Nelson and many more - they had (have) unique voices that wouldn't fit in today's uniform pattern well enough to give them chance, nevertheless, they are "heroes" who are celebrated in special radio and TV programs and are listed as major influences by many of today's stars...

Kind Regards, Walter
User avatar
Rick Campbell
Posts: 4283
Joined: 8 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Sneedville, TN, USA

Post by Rick Campbell »

I don't think talent and style has as much to do with success today as it did in the past. So many of the singers sound alike now, and some are huge stars, while others not so much, or not at all.

It used to be that most all records got some airplay and if people liked them and requested to hear them again, they became popular. Nowdays, only the songs chosen by the major labels ever get a shot at FM radio. I guess there's a lot more material being recorded now than before.

I think it's all in the promotion and marketing, and of course how much money they want to put into it. I believe the industry could make Elmer Fudd or Donald Duck into a country singing star, if they wanted to.

It's akin to the fashion styles. I remember when my mother and sister couldn't wait until the new JC Penny's and Sears catalogs came in the mail so they could see what kind of clothing was going to be in style for the season. Nevermind what you like,.....it all about what you're told you're supposed to like, in order to be cool. Kind of the tail wagging the dog.

We all know great singers that will never make it into stardom because they don't have the backing of the industry. I don't know if it's right or wrong, but I do believe that's pretty much the way it is.

:)
User avatar
James Cann
Posts: 1651
Joined: 27 Sep 2004 12:01 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post by James Cann »

I honestly can't believe that all the southern/country accents I hear these days are real.
Ain't it the truth!--and if that weren't enough, the formulaic jingoism in so many lyrics is laughable: all this prideful emoting about the hard life, homegrown front porch harmony, momma and daddy, church and chicken on Sunday, farm-bred morality, homesickness for all of it, etc., etc., by singers who have little or no real connection to it. However, don't they ever latch onto the schtik because what else do they have?
Gene Jones
Posts: 6870
Joined: 27 Nov 2000 1:01 am
Location: Oklahoma City, OK USA, (deceased)
Contact:

Post by Gene Jones »

Ernest Bovine, "You could say that a "stylist" is someone who can't do it any other way, even if he tried;"

Earnest, I respect you and your talent, but, you can't really believe what you said! Chalker and others who were stylist's did it both ways in order to make a living.

What you are saying is: "Those who can do it play, but, those who can't, teach.....a belife that is not verified by analysis.
User avatar
Joachim Kettner
Posts: 7523
Joined: 14 Apr 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Joachim Kettner »

Keith Richards once said something like: Songs are in the air, you just got to pick them up. Sometimes I think the air has become pretty thin.
But on the other hand there are still great songs being written, you just have to search a little harder.
Billy Tonnesen
Posts: 1882
Joined: 2 Oct 2006 12:01 am
Location: R.I.P., Buena Park, California
Contact:

Post by Billy Tonnesen »

IMHO I consider a good vocalist as someone who pretty much sings on the beat and you can anticipate when to play fills. What I consider a type of stylist is when they sing and phrase ahead of or behind the beat, finally catching up. It makes it harder to figure when to play fills. You can either leave a big empty spot or clash with them playing at the same time they finally decide to complete or delay a phrase.
User avatar
Joe Miraglia
Posts: 1607
Joined: 4 Aug 1998 11:00 pm
Location: Jamestown N.Y.

Post by Joe Miraglia »

Donny Hinson wrote:I honestly can't believe that all the southern/country accents I hear these days are real. I've been listening to country music for over a half-century, and believe me, there weren't even this many "drawls and "y'alls" back in the days of Kitty, Hank, Loretta, and Webb. :lol:

I think what I said to a young male singer the other day is true. You are a good singer,and writing some good songs,but you will have a very hard time making it in Nashville,or in country music coming from the North. I can,t name anyone from the North that has made it big in country music.I think some people think that country music is a southern thing. Joe
User avatar
Rick Campbell
Posts: 4283
Joined: 8 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Sneedville, TN, USA

Post by Rick Campbell »

Joe Miraglia wrote:
Donny Hinson wrote:I honestly can't believe that all the southern/country accents I hear these days are real. I've been listening to country music for over a half-century, and believe me, there weren't even this many "drawls and "y'alls" back in the days of Kitty, Hank, Loretta, and Webb. :lol:

I think what I said to a young male singer the other day is true. You are a good singer,and writing some good songs,but you will have a very hard time making it in Nashville,or in country music coming from the North. I can,t name anyone from the North that has made it big in country music.I think some people think that country music is a southern thing. Joe
Joe, that's a good point. I can't think of anyone either, but there has to be some. Patsy Cline was from Winchester, VA, that's about as far north as I can think of right now, but that's a far cry from NY, and New England.

I don't know where Kid Rock and Darius Rucker are from, they might blow your theory all to pieces.

Someone please tell us some country stars that were from up north. This is a good subject. :)

NOTE: I started another thread regarding this. Please respond there.
Post Reply