String gauges for Fender 400?

Instruments, mechanical issues, copedents, techniques, etc.

Moderator: Shoshanah Marohn

Post Reply
User avatar
Aaron Harms
Posts: 71
Joined: 9 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Missouri, USA
Contact:

String gauges for Fender 400?

Post by Aaron Harms »

Hey all,

Getting ready to change strings and realized that I may need new string gauges, given a new tuning. I've got a shortscale Fender 400, planning on tuning it low to high, E-B-E-F#-G#-B-E-G#.

Suggestions for best possible gauges I should use?

Thanks in advance, you guys are the best.

Aaron
User avatar
basilh
Posts: 7694
Joined: 26 May 1999 12:01 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by basilh »

Hi Aaron, the gauges would be determined NOT by the open tuning but by the highest note required on each individual string. Without knowing what your intended copedent is, it would be only guesswork to suggest gauges..
User avatar
Aaron Harms
Posts: 71
Joined: 9 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Missouri, USA
Contact:

Post by Aaron Harms »

Ah, sorry Basil.

I don't have a handy copedent to post here at work, but the highest notes for each string would be, low to high:

E-C#-F-F#-A-C#-F-A
User avatar
Jim Sliff
Posts: 7059
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Lawndale California, USA

Post by Jim Sliff »

Aaron, if you go to Fender's site you can download an original pedal steel manual that has a string gage chart. It shows recommended gages for each note independent of tuning. The chart is, as I recall, for the long-scale version; what I have always done on my short-scale 400 is go two-thousandths higher on each string than the recommended gage for long-scale, and it works out fine.
No chops, but great tone
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
Moon in Alaska
Posts: 1286
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kasilof, Alaska * R.I.P.
Contact:

Post by Moon in Alaska »

Your tuning is allmost E9th without the 2 chromatic strings...strings 1 and 2...
I have a short scale Fender 400..I just use a standard set for E9th, and don't use the 1st and 2nd..
Good luck !!!
Moon
<<Moon>>
==Carter S-10==
1962 Fender 400
== Evans FET 500 Custom LV ==

http://www.geocities.com/moon9999610/alaska.html
User avatar
Aaron Harms
Posts: 71
Joined: 9 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Missouri, USA
Contact:

Post by Aaron Harms »

Thanks for the words, guys. I'm currently straining my eyes to read the chart, and it seems like my high G# would be an 011, which, Jim, you'd say an 013?

That seems mighty thick, so I'm double checking before I screw this up.

Moon: I ditched the D in the middle in favor of keeping the low E and the high G#, but you're of course correct--I started with the fairly standard E9 for 8 string and eventually morphed to this..which is why I'm having to change gauges;)

Thanks again:)

A
Moon in Alaska
Posts: 1286
Joined: 2 Dec 1999 1:01 am
Location: Kasilof, Alaska * R.I.P.
Contact:

Post by Moon in Alaska »

I have use a 11....11.5.....and a 12 on mine for the high G#...They all work, but I favor the 12 because it seems to be a little louder...
Moon
<<Moon>>
==Carter S-10==
1962 Fender 400
== Evans FET 500 Custom LV ==

http://www.geocities.com/moon9999610/alaska.html
User avatar
Jim Sliff
Posts: 7059
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 12:01 am
Location: Lawndale California, USA

Post by Jim Sliff »

No, they changed the manuals around and now have a short-scale 400 manual up - so an .011 would be correct for the G#. I was talking about the chart that came with the long-scale instruments, which had been the one most commonly found; but Fender has switched them around a bit. That guide would be th ecorrect one for your guitar.
No chops, but great tone
1930's/40's Rickenbacher/Rickenbacker 6&8 string lap steels
1921 Weissenborn Style 2; Hilo&Schireson hollownecks
Appalachian, Regal & Dobro squarenecks
1959 Fender 400 9+2 B6;1960's Fender 800 3+3+2; 1948 Fender Dual-8 Professional
User avatar
Aaron Harms
Posts: 71
Joined: 9 May 2006 12:01 am
Location: Missouri, USA
Contact:

Post by Aaron Harms »

Thanks Jim!

011 sounds about right, and I can work my way back from there:)

A
Post Reply